Who Is Michael Avenatti's New Criminal Defense Lawyer in California?
Avenatti, who faces 36 counts of tax fraud and bankruptcy fraud in California, showed up in court Wednesday with a new criminal defense lawyer.
May 15, 2019 at 07:28 PM
4 minute read
Michael Avenatti has a new lawyer.
The disgraced California attorney, facing criminal charges of extortion, bank fraud and tax fraud, appeared in court Wednesday, represented by a new lawyer: H. Dean Steward. Steward is a criminal defense lawyer who was in charge of the federal public defender's office in Orange County, California, for 12 years.
Steward, in San Clemente, California, did not respond to a request for comment.
Avenatti was the lawyer for Stephanie Clifford, the adult film actress performing as Stormy Daniels, who filed a lawsuit claiming she was paid thousands of dollars during the 2016 presidential campaign to keep quiet about a sexual affair with Donald Trump.
But, in March, federal prosecutors filed criminal charges against him in both California and New York. In California, where Avenatti was a practicing attorney, prosecutors have brought 36 counts against him, including stealing more than $12 million from clients in at least four settlements.
At an initial appearance April 1, Avenatti showed up in court with lawyers from Orange County boutique Bienert Katzman. But, on April 29, U.S. Magistrate Judge John Early appointed a federal public defender for Avenatti's arraignment.
Wednesday's hearing came about after prosecutors demanded that Avenatti either retain counsel or have a public defender appointed to him.
The government, prosecutors wrote in a filing earlier this month, “does not believe that there is any valid reason why defendant has yet to resolve his representation issues and is concerned that defendant will seek to use such issues to unnecessarily delay this prosecution.”
“Defendant has a pattern and practice of using delay tactics to avoid responsibility for his conduct,” they wrote.
Prosecutors had asked that Avenatti submit a financial affidavit in the event that he got a public defender. They insisted that Avenatti had the financial means to hire a lawyer, noting statements he made on CNN about a luxury condominium that he was renting for $11,000 a month.
On Tuesday, two new public defenders filed an application on behalf of Avenatti to appoint them under the condition that he would contribute to their legal costs but not submit a financial affidavit “at this stage of the case” due to “the complexity of his financial condition” and the risks of self-incrimination.
“Providing a complete picture of Mr. Avenatti's finances at this stage of the proceeding would be a demanding and time-intensive effort,” they wrote. They noted that Avenatti was involved in several civil lawsuits, both professionally and personally. Further, they wrote, the two forfeiture counts in the criminal case in California made it difficult for Avenatti to hire private counsel.
U.S. District Judge James Selna of the Central District of California denied the request.
Steward has represented corporate executives and high-profile law enforcement officers in the Los Angeles area. He is best known for representing Lori Drew, the Missouri mom convicted in what was considered the first cyberbullying criminal trial. Drew allegedly set up a fake MySpace account to harass a 13-year-old girl who later committed suicide. A federal judge dismissed Drew's convictions in 2009.
Steward's hiring means that the June 4 trial date in Avenatti's California case is likely to change.
It's unclear whether Steward represents Avenatti in separate criminal charges that federal prosecutors have brought against him in New York. Those include attempting to extort more than $20 million out of athletic apparel company Nike Inc.
In that case, according to prosecutors, Avenatti had asked to extend the deadline for the government to file an indictment until he could retain counsel. U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman of the Southern District of New York granted that continuance to May 28.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 2Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 3On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
- 4Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 5Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250