Revenue Growth Trailed in California as Collections Slowed: Citi Report
Law firms in California experienced lower revenue growth during the first quarter of 2019 in a departure from last year's trend, according to a report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
May 16, 2019 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
After leading the pack last year, law firms in California experienced below-average growth in the first quarter of 2019, according to a report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“Both the Northern and Southern California markets trailed national average in terms of revenue growth,” said David Altuna, of Citi Private Bank. According to Altuna, the first quarter revenue growth for Northern California firms was 3.7%, and for Southern California firms was 1.5%, while the national average was 4.5%.
“In both cases, a big driver of this would be the fact collections are really challenged in the entire state,” Altuna said, adding that the California regions ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in terms of the collections slowdown.
The collection cycle lengthened 1% on average, according to Citi. That said, industrywide inventory growth remained relatively strong, at 5.6%, which should bring some collections momentum into the second quarter.
While their collections suffered, California firms reported the highest inventory growth for the first quarter of all the regions Citi surveyed. Northern California firms saw inventory grow 12.7%, and inventory level for Southern California firms increased by 11.4%.
Demand was also stronger in California: it was up 3.1% for firms in Northern California and 0.6% for Southern California firms. Meanwhile, demand dropped by 0.3% on average across the industry, a departure from the record demand growth in 2018.
Nationally, lawyer billing rates continued to increase at the elevated pace that firms experienced in 2018, coming in at 4.4% for the first quarter. But firms in Northern California reported more modest growth of 2.8%, the lowest among all 11 geographic regions analyzed. Southern California firms saw billing rate growth of 5.2%, ranking No. 3 of all the U.S. regions.
California firms also had greater expense growth than in other regions. Northern California firms saw their expenses increase by 8.2% during the first quarter, and Southern California firms experienced a 7.7% increase, both exceeding the industry average of 6.5%.
“In both cases, quite a bit of increase is coming through from lawyer compensation,” Altuna said. In Northern California, lawyer compensation expenses jumped by 10.8%, and in Southern California, they were up 8.8%.
The two regions also experienced increases in operating expenses, as firms continued to invest in office space, technology and project management initiatives, Altuna added.
“To sum it up, it is a slower start for the region,” Altuna said. “But, in some cases, the fundamentals aren't totally off. It is just potentially a timing issue with the collections, which hopefully will correct itself through the year.”
Firms in California continued to add attorneys through the first quarter, following above-average head count growth in 2018. The total lawyer head count at Northern California firms rose by 4.7% and at Southern California firms it was up by 2.6%. Both exceeded the national average head count growth of 1.8%.
Both regions also topped the national average in terms of equity partnership growth. The Northern California region saw its equity tier grow by 2%, well above the industry average of 0.2%. Firms in Southern California grew equity partnership by 1.9%.
Nationwide, lawyer productivity declined 1.8%, reversing the gains the industry saw in 2018. Similarly, Northern California saw productivity decline by 1%, and Southern California watched it drop by 1.9% during the first quarter.
|Read More
Law Firm Revenue Rose as Demand Dropped in the First Quarter of 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250