Revenue Growth Trailed in California as Collections Slowed: Citi Report
Law firms in California experienced lower revenue growth during the first quarter of 2019 in a departure from last year's trend, according to a report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
May 16, 2019 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
After leading the pack last year, law firms in California experienced below-average growth in the first quarter of 2019, according to a report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“Both the Northern and Southern California markets trailed national average in terms of revenue growth,” said David Altuna, of Citi Private Bank. According to Altuna, the first quarter revenue growth for Northern California firms was 3.7%, and for Southern California firms was 1.5%, while the national average was 4.5%.
“In both cases, a big driver of this would be the fact collections are really challenged in the entire state,” Altuna said, adding that the California regions ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in terms of the collections slowdown.
The collection cycle lengthened 1% on average, according to Citi. That said, industrywide inventory growth remained relatively strong, at 5.6%, which should bring some collections momentum into the second quarter.
While their collections suffered, California firms reported the highest inventory growth for the first quarter of all the regions Citi surveyed. Northern California firms saw inventory grow 12.7%, and inventory level for Southern California firms increased by 11.4%.
Demand was also stronger in California: it was up 3.1% for firms in Northern California and 0.6% for Southern California firms. Meanwhile, demand dropped by 0.3% on average across the industry, a departure from the record demand growth in 2018.
Nationally, lawyer billing rates continued to increase at the elevated pace that firms experienced in 2018, coming in at 4.4% for the first quarter. But firms in Northern California reported more modest growth of 2.8%, the lowest among all 11 geographic regions analyzed. Southern California firms saw billing rate growth of 5.2%, ranking No. 3 of all the U.S. regions.
California firms also had greater expense growth than in other regions. Northern California firms saw their expenses increase by 8.2% during the first quarter, and Southern California firms experienced a 7.7% increase, both exceeding the industry average of 6.5%.
“In both cases, quite a bit of increase is coming through from lawyer compensation,” Altuna said. In Northern California, lawyer compensation expenses jumped by 10.8%, and in Southern California, they were up 8.8%.
The two regions also experienced increases in operating expenses, as firms continued to invest in office space, technology and project management initiatives, Altuna added.
“To sum it up, it is a slower start for the region,” Altuna said. “But, in some cases, the fundamentals aren't totally off. It is just potentially a timing issue with the collections, which hopefully will correct itself through the year.”
Firms in California continued to add attorneys through the first quarter, following above-average head count growth in 2018. The total lawyer head count at Northern California firms rose by 4.7% and at Southern California firms it was up by 2.6%. Both exceeded the national average head count growth of 1.8%.
Both regions also topped the national average in terms of equity partnership growth. The Northern California region saw its equity tier grow by 2%, well above the industry average of 0.2%. Firms in Southern California grew equity partnership by 1.9%.
Nationwide, lawyer productivity declined 1.8%, reversing the gains the industry saw in 2018. Similarly, Northern California saw productivity decline by 1%, and Southern California watched it drop by 1.9% during the first quarter.
Read More
Law Firm Revenue Rose as Demand Dropped in the First Quarter of 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Shareholder Democracy? The Chatter Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Is Spurring Between Lawyers and Clients
6 minute readMany LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 2What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 3Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 4Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
- 5Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250