Quinn Emanuel, Zhong Lun Use Mock Trial to 'Demystify' Chinese IP System
Quinn Emanuel has responded to growing demand for IP work in China, as U.S. tech companies look to enforce their rights there.
May 23, 2019 at 05:25 PM
3 minute read
In China, foreign lawyers are not permitted to attend patent trials.
So to unveil the Chinese court system for a U.S. audience, lawyers from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan hosted a mock patent trial with Beijing-headquartered international firm Zhong Lun Law Firm on Thursday, to demonstrate how patent procedures unfold in China.
“We have noticed, especially in the recent year, that there has been growing demand and interest for U.S. tech companies in particular to enforce their technology rights, their intellectual properties, in China,” said Mark Tung, a Silicon Valley-based partner at Quinn Emanuel, who specializes in intellectual property litigation in federal courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Thursday's mock trial provided an example of a Chinese patent case, in which a foreign company was able to enforce its patents in China. It presented a fictitious dispute between Company A and Company B, over a “spindle motor” patent.
Tung said as more companies expand internationally, more of them are recognizing the importance of maintaining and enforcing their IP rights across jurisdictions, especially in China, which has the fastest growing economy in the world.
“China is now one of the three most important IP jurisdictions in the world … along with the United States and Germany,” said partner Sam Stake, who joined Quinn Emanuel's San Francisco office in 2008. “In fact, more patents are filed every year in China than in any other country in the world.”
However, both Tung and Stake noted that a challenge of practicing IP law in China is that, unlike in the U.S. legal system, patent processing in China tends to be closed to the public, and the discovery process is much more limited.
“How do you show, without getting documents from the other side, that the other side's products actually practice your patents?” Tung said.
Quinn Emanuel partners with a number of local counsel in China, including Zhong Lun, to help facilitate its clients' increasing IP needs.
“This event for us is really an educational event for clients here in Silicon Valley, California, to help demystify the process of Chinese patent litigation, so that our clients can get more comfortable with the procedure,” said Xiao Liu, a Shanghai-based lawyer who joined Quinn Emanuel from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in 2018.
According to Quinn Emanuel, the litigation giant has 139 partners in its IP department, while Zhong Lun said it has 18 partners and 107 lawyers involved in its patent practice.
Tung said he learns about some new development in the Chinese patent system every time he travels there, as the government looks to make reforms.
“The fact that it is changing so rapidly, to me, [says] indicatively there a push to improve the system. There is a recognition that a strong intellectual property system is important to form the foundation of Chinese economic growth,” Tung said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
2 minute read'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Shareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Old Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250