Brewer Agrees to Label Changes to Settle Claims Hawaii-Themed 'Kona' Beers Are Brewed Stateside
The Craft Brew Alliance has also agreed to pay up to $10 each to consumers who lack proof of purchase to settle claims that they misled consumers about the brewing location of its Hawaii-themed suds. The company, however, has retained the option to terminate the settlement if there are more than 1 million claims.
May 24, 2019 at 01:50 PM
3 minute read
The maker of the Kona Brewing Co. line of beers has reached a deal to settle class action claims that the company misled consumers to believe that its Hawaii-themed brews were made in the Aloha State when they were actually brewed in the continental U.S.
Plaintiffs lawyers at Faruqi & Faruqi and the Wand Law Firm filed court papers Thursday indicating the Craft Brew Alliance Inc., or CBA, has agreed to list the actual brewing site or all locations where Kona beers are brewed on all consumer-facing packaging for a minimum of four years.
A mock-up of the new packaging for the brand's Big Wave Golden Ale included in the exhibits attached to Thursday's court filing lists Kona, Hawaii; Portland, Oregon; and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. As part of the proposed deal, the company has also agreed to refund consumers up to $20 if they have proof they purchased the Kona beers during the class period and up to $10 if they have no proof of purchase. The parties expect that there are about 7.8 million potential class members, but, given the possibility of fraudulent claims where no proof of purchase is presented, Kona has reserved the right to terminate the settlement if more than 1 million claims are submitted. Plaintiffs counsel are seeking $2.9 million in attorney fees, to be paid by CBA separate and apart from the settlement funds.
The proposed deal requires approval from U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman of the Northern District of California, who has been overseeing the litigation.
Representatives from the company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. Neither did Shook, Hardy & Bacon partner Tammy Webb, who has represented the brewer.
Plaintiffs filed suit against CBA in 2017, claiming that six- and 12-packs of Kona favorites, including Wailua Wheat Ale, Hanalei Island IPA, Castaway IPA, Lavaman Red Ale, Lemongrass Luau, Koko Brown and Pipeline Porter, came from breweries in Oregon, Washington, New Hampshire and Tennessee, rather than Hawaii's Big Island. They claimed the company obscured that fact by only listing its Hawaii address on its multipacks, and including a map pinpointing Kona's Big Island Brewery with an invitation to visit the brewery and pubs when in Hawaii. Freeman denied CBA's motion to dismiss the lawsuit in September 2017, and certified a class of consumers in the case last October. The parties reached the settlement after two mediation sessions with Bruce Edwards of JAMS in San Francisco.
The lawsuit has come under criticism from the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, which included it on its annual list of the year's 10 “most ridiculous” lawsuits in 2018. But Benjamin Heikali of Faruqi & Faruqi said in an email Friday that the plaintiffs' team considered the settlement an “excellent result” for the class. He also said that termination provision was not out of the ordinary. A similar termination provision was approved recently in a settlement in a case in the Northern District involving claims related to Canada Dry labels that said “Made with Real Ginger.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow We Won: BraunHagey’s $56M Trademark Win Over Molson Coors Upheld by 9th Circuit
8 minute read'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readJudge to Hear Arguments on Whether Google's Advertising Tech Constitutes a Monopoly
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250