Brewer Agrees to Label Changes to Settle Claims Hawaii-Themed 'Kona' Beers Are Brewed Stateside
The Craft Brew Alliance has also agreed to pay up to $10 each to consumers who lack proof of purchase to settle claims that they misled consumers about the brewing location of its Hawaii-themed suds. The company, however, has retained the option to terminate the settlement if there are more than 1 million claims.
May 24, 2019 at 01:50 PM
3 minute read
The maker of the Kona Brewing Co. line of beers has reached a deal to settle class action claims that the company misled consumers to believe that its Hawaii-themed brews were made in the Aloha State when they were actually brewed in the continental U.S.
Plaintiffs lawyers at Faruqi & Faruqi and the Wand Law Firm filed court papers Thursday indicating the Craft Brew Alliance Inc., or CBA, has agreed to list the actual brewing site or all locations where Kona beers are brewed on all consumer-facing packaging for a minimum of four years.
A mock-up of the new packaging for the brand's Big Wave Golden Ale included in the exhibits attached to Thursday's court filing lists Kona, Hawaii; Portland, Oregon; and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. As part of the proposed deal, the company has also agreed to refund consumers up to $20 if they have proof they purchased the Kona beers during the class period and up to $10 if they have no proof of purchase. The parties expect that there are about 7.8 million potential class members, but, given the possibility of fraudulent claims where no proof of purchase is presented, Kona has reserved the right to terminate the settlement if more than 1 million claims are submitted. Plaintiffs counsel are seeking $2.9 million in attorney fees, to be paid by CBA separate and apart from the settlement funds.
The proposed deal requires approval from U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman of the Northern District of California, who has been overseeing the litigation.
Representatives from the company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. Neither did Shook, Hardy & Bacon partner Tammy Webb, who has represented the brewer.
Plaintiffs filed suit against CBA in 2017, claiming that six- and 12-packs of Kona favorites, including Wailua Wheat Ale, Hanalei Island IPA, Castaway IPA, Lavaman Red Ale, Lemongrass Luau, Koko Brown and Pipeline Porter, came from breweries in Oregon, Washington, New Hampshire and Tennessee, rather than Hawaii's Big Island. They claimed the company obscured that fact by only listing its Hawaii address on its multipacks, and including a map pinpointing Kona's Big Island Brewery with an invitation to visit the brewery and pubs when in Hawaii. Freeman denied CBA's motion to dismiss the lawsuit in September 2017, and certified a class of consumers in the case last October. The parties reached the settlement after two mediation sessions with Bruce Edwards of JAMS in San Francisco.
The lawsuit has come under criticism from the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, which included it on its annual list of the year's 10 “most ridiculous” lawsuits in 2018. But Benjamin Heikali of Faruqi & Faruqi said in an email Friday that the plaintiffs' team considered the settlement an “excellent result” for the class. He also said that termination provision was not out of the ordinary. A similar termination provision was approved recently in a settlement in a case in the Northern District involving claims related to Canada Dry labels that said “Made with Real Ginger.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Hershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
'Rocket Docket': EDVA Judge Controls Google's Fate in Ad Tech Monopoly Trial
4 minute read'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250