Former Federal Circuit Clerks Launch IPR-Focused Firm
Michelle Armond of Knobbe Martens and Douglas Wilson of Heim, Payne & Chorush say Patent Office practice has evened the playing field for a new entrant like Armond Wilson.
May 24, 2019 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Michelle Armond and Douglas Wilson met 15 years ago while applying for clerkships at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. They spent a year and a half clerking together for Judge Richard Linn. “It was really fun to be there, to work on important cases and be at the forefront of patent law,” Armond says.
The two went on to become partners at different intellectual property firms: Armond at California's Knobbe Martens, Wilson at Texas' Heim, Payne & Chorush.
But they've stayed in touch over the years, and now they're joining forces to open Armond Wilson, an IP firm that will focus on the administrative challenges to patent validity at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. They'll also handle appeals of those cases, known as IPRs, to the Federal Circuit.
Armond and Wilson say the time is right to take advantage of a market shift that puts smaller firms on stronger footing. “PTAB litigation is now the forefront of patent litigation, but these cases are much different than traditional district court litigation,” Armond says. “You have smaller cases, they're highly technical, and they're immediately appealed to the Federal Circuit.”
“It doesn't take an army of lawyers to win an IPR, it just takes talent,” says Wilson. A small firm, with more flexible billing arrangements, “is an advantage in the IPR practice.”
IPRs have kept them both busy. Armond won a Federal Circuit ruling last year upholding a PTAB judgment she obtained for Spectrum Brands in a mobile device security case. Wilson will appear before the Federal Circuit on June 3 to defend three PTAB judgments on behalf of oilfield services company Weatherford International.
Armond will continue to work from Irvine and Wilson from Austin, though the two expect to spend a lot of time in Washington. They represent both petitioners and patent owners, and expect to take some cases from start to finish while handling just appeals in others. They also expect to continue practicing in district court.
Armond has an electrical engineering degree from the California Institute of Technology and a J.D. from University of California, Berkeley. She started her career at Irell & Manella, and at Knobbe was co-chair of the firm's Patent Office litigation practice with Brent Babcock, who joined Womble Bond Dickinson last fall. Wilson describes Armond as having a strong grasp on clients' business interests and cost-effective patent strategies for them.
“Knobbe was a great fit for me,” Armond said. “Building and leading Knobbe's patent office litigation practice group with Brent was a highlight. But after 12 years it was time for me to leave.”
Wilson has a chemical engineering degree from Lamar University and spent four years at Fina Oil and Chemical Co. before getting his law degree at the University of Texas. He started his law career at Conley Rose, and joined the group that spun off in 2006 to create Heim Payne. He practices both patent and antitrust litigation, with much of his recent focus on IPRs.
“We had developed very similar practices independently,” Armond said. “It's kind of like we've come full circle. We started our careers together, and now we're starting this next chapter together.”
Along with being engineers and registered patent attorneys, they share another characteristic. “We take our law practice very seriously, but we don't actually take ourselves very seriously,” Armond says. “We have a lot of fun at the office. Every day something very entertaining happens, and we enjoy that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Bonta, Environmental Groups Sue Exxon Mobil Over Plastic Recycling Claims
4 minute readHarvard College and Ward, Smith & Hill File Patent Infringement Suit Against Samsung
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250