Sedgwick Asks Bankruptcy Judge to Approve $1.6M Settlement With Ex-Partners
The defunct San Francisco-based law firm says the deal will expedite the resolution of Chapter 11 proceedings, but creditors have vowed to fight it.
June 07, 2019 at 05:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The defunct law firm Sedgwick asked a federal bankruptcy judge Thursday to approve a clawback settlement with 45 former partners who have agreed to return a total of $1.595 million paid to them during the firm's 2017 collapse.
A 27-page filing by the firm's bankruptcy counsel indicates that certain partners who are not part of the settlement might still be vulnerable to breach of fiduciary duty claims.
Still, the firm said that the settlement will expedite the resolution of Chapter 11 proceedings in the Northern District of California, which began in October 2018.
“The debtor believes that further negotiation or active litigation against the settling partners will not increase the cash available for distributions to creditors but will only dissipate cash that could otherwise be used to pay the allowed claims of unsecured creditors,” said Sedgwick's bankruptcy counsel, John Lucas of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.
The filing also outlines the San Francisco firm's rocky final year, detailing its unsuccessful efforts to find new merger partners after losing two revenue-generating offices.
The filing stated that it has liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million, much of which consists of unpaid lease obligations. About $9 million of the defunct firm's liabilities are owed through accounts payable. In 2018, Sedgwick was sued by multiple landlords claiming that it failed to pay lease termination fees.
Thursday's filing noted the firm did not collapse through unsustainable guarantees to partners.
“It is important to note that the debtor was not a Dewey, Heller or Brobeck,” it said, referring to other defunct firms. “The firm's former equity partners were not operating under contractual guarantees that required the firm to pay partners fixed compensation without regard to such partners' actual book of business and receivables generated,” it said.
“Nor was the debtor inflating income or profits to ensure that partners would not leave or artificially enhance the firm's ratings,” the filing continued.
It also acknowledged the sacrifices of the partners who stuck around. ”Nearly all of the setting partners remained at the firm throughout 2017, continued to bring in clients, collect receivables and were paid a small fraction of what they were paid in prior years or what they could have been paid at [others] had they left the firm,” the filing said.
The bankruptcy filing by Sedgwick came after the set of former partners on the firm's dissolution committee hit a roadblock in discussions with a group of 12 of the busted firm's largest creditors.
The firm's creditors followed the firm's filing with a motion Thursday indicating that they would dispute the settlement. The creditors asked to convert a previously scheduled hearing June 13 into a scheduling conference for the pending fight.
But the judge in the case said Friday that scheduling and other details will be handled at a hearing now set for July 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Holds Barred': Why Alston & Bird Is Leaning Into Los Angeles
'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250