PG&E Hires Morrison & Foerster to Defend CPUC Investigation
Morrison & Foerster is now one of several large firms with a hand in the utility giant's bankruptcy proceedings.
June 13, 2019 at 04:38 PM
3 minute read
Morrison & Foerster is the latest law firm hired by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. as the utility giant navigates the legal fallout of California wildfires.
A California federal bankruptcy judge Tuesday approved PG&E's motion to hire Morrison & Foerster as special counsel to represent it during its bankruptcy with regard to investigations by its state regulator.
Morrison & Foerster will represent the utility on legal matters involving ongoing governmental investigations by the Safety and Enforcement Division of the California Public Utilities Commission, according to PG&E's application, which was approved by Judge Dennis Montali of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.
The filing did not go into detail about the associated legal fees, but said they will be “in accordance with Morrison & Foerster's standard hourly rates.”
CPUC is investigating allegations that the utility violated state laws and regulations in connection with the deadly wildfires in Northern California in 2017 and 2018. The most recent of those, the Camp Fire, killed 86 people and destroyed more than 18,000 properties, according to PG&E's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
In addition to hiring Morrison & Foerster, PG&E is employing Weil, Gotshal & Manges as lead bankruptcy counsel; Keller & Benvenutti as co-bankruptcy counsel; Cravath, Swaine & Moore as corporate counsel; and Munger, Tolles & Olson as regulatory counsel.
In a series of March filings, the utility giant said it has paid its legal counsel at least $84 million for legal services leading up to the company's January bankruptcy filing.
Since early 2018, Morrison & Foerster has served as regulatory defense counsel to PG&E and provided legal advice concerning ongoing governmental investigations by the Safety and Enforcement Division of the CPUC, according to PG&E's application, which was filed May 22.
“The Debtors also have selected Morrison & Foerster as their attorneys because of the firm's extensive general experience in and knowledge of the energy industry, as well as Morrison & Foerster's recognized expertise in the field of regulatory defense, criminal investigations, and litigation involving state and federal government entities,” PG&E said in its motion to obtain Morrison & Foerster as special regulatory counsel.
The utility said Morrison & Foerster partner Joshua Hill has previously represented the company in an investigation by the CPUC related to PG&E's gas distribution record-keeping and safety practices.
“As a result of its [previous] representation of the debtors, and, in particular, Joshua Hill's prior representation of the debtors, Morrison & Foerster has acquired familiarity with the debtors' operations generally, as well as in-depth knowledge of the facts and circumstances specific to the ongoing investigations against the debtors,” PG&E said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTwo Judges. 60-Plus Years on the Bench. Plenty of Advice.
USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
- 3Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 4Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 5The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250