Former Jones Day Partner Drops Gender Discrimination Suit Against Firm
A spokesman for Jones Day said that former partner Wendy Moore, now a partner in the Palo Alto office of Perkins Coie, had dismissed all claims against the firm in exchange for the return of her capital contribution.
June 17, 2019 at 07:13 PM
2 minute read
Wendy Moore, the former Jones Day partner who sued the firm last year claiming that its black box pay system led to gender disparities, has dismissed all claims according to the firm.
Moore sued the firm in June 2018, claiming that it operates as a “fraternity.” The suit alleged that Jones Day violated California's equal pay law and Labor Code through “systematic gender discrimination in compensation.” Moore also asserted that the firm retaliated against her after she spoke up within Jones Day about gender bias issues.
A spokesman for Jones Day said Monday that Moore “has now dismissed all of her claims against Jones Day in exchange for return of the capital that she previously contributed to the Firm.”
Moore, who advises on executive compensation matters as a partner in the Palo Alto office of Perkins Coie, referred a request for comment to Sanford Heisler Sharp, the firm which filed suit on Moore's behalf in San Francisco Superior Court last year. Though an outside spokesperson, Sanford declined to comment Monday afternoon.
Even with the resolution of Moore's lawsuit, Jones Day still faces a separate gender discrimination lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., earlier this year. Nilab Rahyar Tolton and Andrea Mazingo, who worked as associates in Jones Day's Irvine office, sued the firm along with four unnamed former Jones Day associates in a proposed $200 million gender discrimination class action against the firm in April.
The federal lawsuit, also filed by counsel at Sanford Heisler, made claims similar to Moore's about Jones Day's firm culture. Jessica Jardine Wilkes, an associate at Jones Day from October 2014 to September 2016 who is now product counsel at Facebook, asked to join the federal lawsuit as an additional named plaintiff earlier this month.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Ruling Provides Lessons for Investors: Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
6 minute readVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
Trending Stories
- 14th Circuit Judge Wynn Walks Back Senior Status Plans
- 2Beyond Bordeaux’s Bankruptcy: A Lesson In Adapting to the Evolving Sports Media Landscape
- 3What Next For Eversheds in Ireland?
- 4Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
- 5Lawyers’ Letters to Santa
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250