Lender Claims Tom Girardi and Wife, 'Real Housewives' Star Erika Jayne, Used Law Firm Loan to Fund 'High-End Lifestyle'
Already facing a lawsuit in Los Angeles state court over a loan from Law Finance Group, Girardi and his firm were hit with another over repayment of a $5-plus million loan from Arizona lender Stillwell Madison. The new suit also names Girardi's wife, "Real Housewives of Beverley Hills" cast member Erika Jayne, claiming that the couple used funds designated for the firm "in order to sustain their lavish lifestyle and maintain their glamorous public image."
June 18, 2019 at 01:50 PM
4 minute read
Already fighting a lawsuit from one litigation funder in Los Angeles state court, Thomas Girardi and his law firm have been hit with another lawsuit in federal court in Arizona claiming that the prominent plaintiffs attorney has failed to keep up with payments on a loan of more than $5 million taken out to fund the firm's caseload.
The Arizona lawsuit also names Girardi's wife, “Real Housewives of Beverley Hills” cast member Erika Jayne, and claims that the couple used funds designated for Girardi & Keese “in order to sustain their lavish lifestyle and maintain their glamorous public image.”
Filed by lawyers at DLA Piper on behalf of lender Stillwell Madison, the complaint claims that “the Firm and Mr. Girardi intended at the time the loan agreement was entered to use at least a portion of the loan funds to support Mr. Girardi and his wife's high-end lifestyle, but concealed this fact from Stillwell.”
The suit filed on May 24 in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona claims that the firm borrowed $5,110,440.38 in April 2016 and that the firm and Girardi—the firm's “100% owner”—still owe Stillwell at least $3,454,804.00.
Girardi didn't immediately respond to email and phone messages Monday night and Tuesday morning. His assistant said Tuesday that he was out of the office at a settlement conference.
The Arizona lawsuit comes as Girardi is engaged with a separate dispute with Mill Valley-based funder Law Finance Group over the repayment of a loan of more than $15 million. Law Finance Group claims that Girardi and the firm refused to hand over recovered fees from cases the parties allegedly agreed would repay the loans. Girardi previously told The Recorder that the Law Finance Group loan was taken out on behalf of clients, not for him and the firm.
Law Finance Group's lawyer, Leslie Corwin of Eisner, said that his client was aware of the Arizona lawsuit but declined to comment further. A hearing in the California case is scheduled for June 26.
In addition to breach of contract claims, Stillwell Madison is suing both Girardi and the firm for fraud, claiming they negotiated a forbearance agreement with the lender without informing them of the default on the loan from Law Finance Group. Law Finance Group was included on a list of ”liens or other encumbrances on payments due to transferor from cases” attached to the loan agreement with Stillwell Madison. The Arizona lender claims that, had it known about the default, it never would have agreed to Girardi's August 2018 proposal to allow him to make monthly $500,000 payments on the loan beginning in October 2018 to pay the loan off in full by September 2019.
The Arizona lender further alleges that Girardi didn't make the proposed October payment under the initial forbearance agreement and approached the lender again on Dec. 2, 2018, with a new offer to make three payments of $500,000.00 per month between December 2018 and February 2019 to pay off the full loan balance by March 17, 2019. According to the complaint, Girardi made the full December payment but only paid $250,000 in January 2019 and has made no further payment since.
DLA Piper's Kate Benveniste, who represents Stillwell Madison along with Laura Sixkiller in the firm's Phoenix office, didn't immediately respond to messages Tuesday.
Read the complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
SAG-AFTRA Union Health Plan Slammed With Data Breach Class Actions in Wake of Phishing Attack
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250