How Law Schools Fared on California's February 2019 Bar Exam
The February exam, administered months after most students graduate from law school, typically has a higher percentage of repeat test-takers.
June 19, 2019 at 11:24 AM
3 minute read
Law school graduates from the University of San Diego and the University of Southern California beat the average pass rate on the February 2019 bar exam by more than 20 percentage points, according to school-based figures released Tuesday by the state bar.
Forty-three of 78 University of San Diego alumni who took the spring exam passed for a 55% success rate; 53% of USC test-takers passed. The overall pass rate for the 4,640 applicants who took the bar exam was 31.4%.
Information for many other law schools, including those whose students traditionally ace the test in high numbers, was not furnished by California's bar on Tuesday.
The bar separates pass rates for each school's graduates into two categories: those who were taking the bar exam for the first time and those who were repeating the test. If either category had 11 or fewer students, the bar redacted all statistics in that category. The policy is meant to protect test-takers' identities, bar officials have said.
The February exam, administered months after most students graduate from law school, typically has a higher percentage of repeat test-takers.
At many schools, only a small number of graduates were sitting for the test for the first time, leading the bar to shield their results.
All numbers for Stanford University students were redacted, as were figures that would show the overall pass rates for every out-of-state law school whose graduates took the test. Similarly, the bar did not release any information about how students from Harvard Law School, Georgetown University Law Center and New York University School of Law, among other schools, performed on the test.
Sixty-four percent of UCLA graduates retaking the test passed, but the school's overall pass rate is unknown because data on the 11 or fewer Bruin alumni who took the test for the first time was not disclosed.
Twenty-two percent of students from the Thomas Jefferson School of Law passed the test. The American Bar Association last week revoked the San Diego school's accreditation for failing to comply with its admissions, governance and academic program standards. School leaders are appealing the decision.
The pass rate on California's February 2019 bar exam was the second-lowest in 35 years, reigniting calls for the state Supreme Court to lower the required passing score, known as the test score, at least until additional reviews of the test can be completed. California's cut-score is the second highest in the nation.
The school-specific data the bar released is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250