Manuel Real, Long-Serving and Frequently Reversed District Judge, Dies at 95
Real, the longest-serving federal district judge in modern history, died Wednesday.
June 28, 2019 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
The longest-serving federal district judge in modern history, Manuel Real, has died at age 95.
Real, a U.S. district judge for the Central District of California for 50 years, died on Wednesday, court officials reported Friday. Appointed in 1966 by President Lyndon Johnson, Real was known for his colorful antics in court and was frequently reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
“I am sad beyond words at the death of our beloved friend, colleague, mentor and leader,” said Central District of California Chief Judge Virginia Phillips. “Judge Real has been the heart and soul of our district since it was formed in 1966, and his passing leaves an unfillable void for us, his family, the legal world and the larger community. His legacy of public service is an inspiration beyond compare.”
Real was a 1951 graduate of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. He had served in the U.S. Navy Reserve during World War II from 1943 to 1945. After law school, he was a federal prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of California, later serving as U.S. attorney for that district from 1964 to 1966.
When he was nominated to be a federal judge, the Central District of California had just been created.
In 1970, Real ordered the desegregation of the Pasadena Unified School District.
Real was a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States from 1981 to 1984, and served as chief judge of the Central District of California from 1982 to 1993.
Real, however, developed a reputation for being frequently overturned at the Ninth Circuit. The string of reversals really took hold after Real notoriously feuded with police misconduct litigator Stephen Yagman, whom he fined $250,000 for courtroom behavior during a contentious 1984 defamation trial. Yagman appealed, and the Ninth Circuit reversed Real and ordered another judge to consider the sanction issue. “The fragile appearance of justice has taken a beating,” Ninth Circuit Judge J. Blaine Anderson wrote in In re Yagman. “It is time to conclude the matter as quickly and as painlessly as possible.”
Real though declined to let go of Yagman's case, holding onto it while the outcome of another appeal involving a similar issue was pending. In the other case, the Ninth Circuit again ordered Real removed after he twice refused to follow the court's instruction to dismiss it. After the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Real's personal petition for certiorari, he finally let go of both cases. “I felt very strongly about those cases,” Real told The Recorder in a 1999 judicial profile. “They can sit back and look for something I did wrong and make their calls. That's their job,” he said of the circuit court. “But I'm in the courtroom and I call them like I see them.”
In 2003, Yagman filed a complaint against Real for allegedly taking over a bankruptcy case involving a woman whose loan fraud case the judge was overseeing. Former Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Mary Schroeder initially dismissed the complaint against Real, but later appointed a committee to investigate. By that time, Congress had begun considering whether to initiate impeachment proceedings against Real, who denied wrongdoing. Real said Yagman had a “personal vendetta” against him. The Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ultimately issued a public reprimand of Real.
Among Real's orders reversed by the Ninth Circuit were three decisions in a long-running antitrust class action against the publishers of the Barbri bar review course that led to his removal in a related case in 2016.
Real took senior status on Nov. 4.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
6 minute readBlake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
4 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250