Newsom Vetoes $2.8M for Courthouse Land Purchase Called 'Premature'
State judiciary leaders had not asked for the $2.8 million, as The Recorder documented this month.
June 28, 2019 at 04:06 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday vetoed state funding to buy land for a new courthouse in El Dorado County, calling the $2.8 million allocation “premature” in light of the judicial branch's review of outstanding construction projects.
The line-item veto ends one state senator's efforts to secure last-minute budget funding at the request of a former legislative colleague who owns land near the proposed Placerville courthouse site.
“While I understand that there is a need to build this new courthouse, this expenditure authority is premature until the Judicial Council completes the statutorily-required statewide facilities needs assessment,” Newsom wrote in a brief veto message.
Judicial branch leaders did not ask for the $2.8 million, as The Recorder documented this month. In fact, the line item for the five-acre purchase only appeared in the proposed state budget four days before lawmakers voted on the $215 billion spending plan. It was never vetted or debated in the traditional budget subcommittee process. And the judiciary currently has no money to pay for the six-courtroom courthouse envisioned for the site west of Placerville.
An aide for state Sen. Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, vice chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, confirmed that his former legislative seatmate, John Briggs, lobbied him to include money for the land purchase in the state budget.
The land for the future courthouse is owned by El Dorado County and sits adjacent to the county jail. It was acquired by the county in a 2014 land swap with Briggs, a former Republican state lawmaker who represented Orange and San Bernardino in the 1970s. Briggs, 89, now lives in Elk Grove in Sacramento County, but he still owns property around the future courthouse site. That land, which Briggs said he purchased in 1980, has been marketed for at least five years as a potential business park and home for law offices.
Briggs told The Recorder earlier this month that he pitched Nielsen for the budget funding as a way to help a “cow county” that he said is often overlooked by the Legislature.
The Judicial Council expects to complete its review of all proposed courthouse construction and renovation projects around the state by December. It's not clear where the Placerville court building will fall on the new priority list.
Newsom's veto was the only one affecting the judiciary's budget, which will see significant funding increases from the new governor.
The branch received money for 25 new judgeships around the state plus new funding to expand interpreter services and a program that provides counsel to litigants in certain non-criminal cases. The budget also includes additional money for more lawyers in dependency cases, court technology projects, an increased appellate workload and pay increases for appellate court and Judicial Council workers. Courts will also be allowed to set aside more money in reserves.
“This year's budget is good news for residents who rely on California's judicial system,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said in a statement. “This budget reflects years of advocacy for more trial court judges in the fastest growing parts of our state and will help courts continue initiatives that help break down barriers for all Californians seeking justice.”
Read more:
Why the State's New Budget Gave the Judiciary $2.8M It Didn't Request
Tom Girardi, Facebook's Paul Grewal and Others Will Vet Judges for Newsom
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 2Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 3How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 4Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 5Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250