O'Melveny Fuses LA Roots With Tech Sector Focus in New MediaTech Practice
Partner T. Hale Boggs discusses the new practice group, and why O'Melveny is uniquely situated in the growing Silicon Beach community.
June 28, 2019 at 11:05 AM
5 minute read
Seeking to capture the legal work that emerges as the media and technology industries converge, O'Melveny & Myers has launched a new Los Angeles-based group to service these sectors, expanding the firm's presence in Southern California.
The group is called O'Melveny MediaTech, and will guide established and emerging companies and investors involved in content development and distribution, the firm announced Wednesday. The new group, which comprises more than 20 lawyers from the firm's California and New York offices, will be led by partner T. Hale Boggs, who joined O'Melveny in November 2018 after three decades at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips.
The Recorder caught up with Boggs to learn more about the new “MediaTech” practice and how the firm plans on positioning itself in the growing Silicon Beach market.
Boggs answers have been edited lightly for clarity and style.
Why is the firm establishing the new MediaTech practice?
Boggs: The practice is the result of what I perceive as a transformative time in Southern California in particular. If you spend time here, you just can't help but notice there is a migration of major technology companies choosing the Los Angeles market, many of them focusing on the business of Los Angeles, which I perceive as basically content development and distribution. So, companies like Amazon, Apple, Google, YouTube, [and] Netflix have all moved into the LA market, and in a substantial way—hiring thousands of people locally, spending literally billions of dollars around these different types of new content development distribution models. So for us, we see this as a major opportunity to be involved in this transformation and to help these companies succeed in their business plans.
What has driven the transformation in Southern California, and the so-called Silicon Beach?
Boggs: Southern California has always been the place where people go or stay around [for] content development, [and] that been true since the beginning of Hollywood. As the world[s] of technology and content have increasingly converged with all these mobile devices [and] all of these different types of content platforms, it seems almost inevitable that you're going to see a migration to the Los Angeles area because that is where the content developers are. So, to me, it is almost kind of an inevitable trend and frankly the one I have been involved with and [have been] following for many years.
Who is included in the MediaTech practice group?
Boggs: The practice consists of attorneys here in the firm who are involved either in media and entertainment—mostly here in the Century City office—[or] in technology and venture capital, and that includes myself, others here, and it includes several people from our Silicon Valley office, some people from our New York office, and some people from downtown LA [and] Newport Beach offices.
Who are your clients?
Boggs: There is work we have done and will do for the large companies, basically to help them if they want to expand [into Los Angeles] because it is the market where we have been for 100-plus years, and we really know the space and the important people that you need to know in this market.
We also do have a number of relationships with venture-backed companies in the mediatech sector, as well as traditional LA-based entertainment and media companies that are increasingly involved in new media content and distribution.
With all the other Silicon Valley firms opening offices in Silicon Beach, how is O'Melveny's MediaTech practice different from what they are offering?
Boggs: The main thing that makes O'Melveny different is we are a Los Angeles firm. I have a lot of respect for the Silicon Valley firms that have moved out [to LA], but none of them have the depth and experience, or the knowledge of the local LA landscape, as we do. Nor do they have the depth and experience with media and entertainment legal issues. What I would say about most of those firms, with no intention to disparage any of them, they are good at technology [law], but not necessarily good at the specific sort of media-related technology that is happening here in LA.
Some legal recruiters have said Los Angeles might not have enough qualified legal talent to fill the specific needs of the growing client base. What is your firm doing to address that issue?
Boggs: One thing that we have here at O'Melveny is a large Silicon Valley practice, [with] 35 to 40 lawyers, who are all doing exactly what you described: [the] venture-capital-focused type of practice the Silicon Valley firms do.
We have a whole training program we are implementing, [in which] a large number of associates will be trained with Silicon Valley CEOs and Silicon Valley partners. We also have had some success recruiting people who have a real interest in this space. We are getting those lawyers involved in the types of deals this group is going to be doing, and it becomes the kind of repetitive work they become very efficient at doing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250