Inyo Judge Disciplined for Missing Casework Deadlines
The judge's attorney said he accepts the commission's findings "and will continue to do his very best to adhere to the judicial canons."
July 02, 2019 at 07:29 PM
3 minute read
The Commission on Judicial Performance has admonished an Inyo County judge for signing salary affidavits indicating he was up to date on his casework when he was not.
The admonishment marks the third time in the last 13 years that the commission has warned Superior Court Judge Brian Lamb about failing to meet timelines for disposing of cases. He received an advisory letter in 2006 and a private admonishment in 2015.
“The commission recognizes that Judge Lamb is a hard-working judge, but it did not consider his assertions about his workload or his apologies mitigating in this matter because he has been previously disciplined twice for similar misconduct,” the commission wrote in a disciplinary decision released Tuesday.
State law requires judges, before they are paid, to attest that they don't have any cases pending before them that were submitted for decision more than 90 days prior. The commission said Lamb signed two false salary affidavits in 2017 indicating he was caught up with his work.
Lamb's attorney, Klinedinst partner Daniel Agle, said in an email that the judge accepts the commission's findings “and will continue to do his very best to adhere to the judicial canons and to comport himself in a manner that supports public confidence in the judiciary.”
“Judge Lamb is committed to addressing his judicial caseload in a manner that assures the prompt and correct decision of his cases, as required by law,” Agle said.
Lamb waited more than 14 months to issue a final dissolution in a divorce case from the time the parties filed their last objections in the case, according to the commission. The judge told commissioners he had “lost track” of the matter.
In another divorce case, Lamb delayed issuing a final decision for more than a year. The commission said Lamb issued a tentative ruling in the case in August 2016 and closed pleadings four months later. In March 2017, the petitioner filed a motion asking for a final decision, describing “the negative impact of the delay.” Lamb held a hearing on the petition in June 2017 and issued a final order in September 2017.
Lamb was 63 days late issuing an order in a third divorce case even though a court operations manager and the presiding judges sent him three reminders to close the case on time, the commission said.
All eight commissioners who participated in the case voted to publicly admonish Lamb.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
Trending Stories
- 1In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 2Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
- 3U.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
- 4Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 5Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250