Are You Too Picky? Ask Yourself These Questions First
Being picky is not necessarily a negative thing. In fact, being a discerning professional can enhance the quality of a career.
July 03, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
I've interviewed for a lot of jobs over the last eight months. None of them were perfect so I didn't pursue them. I want to make a move, but my search is taking a long time. Am I being too picky?
It would seem that in an active legal market, finding a new job would be quick and easy … Especially if a candidate had several suitors from which to choose. But reality isn't always what it seems. And the path to pulling the trigger can be filled with bumps in the road: Some outside one's control and others self-imposed.
Candidates who churn through and reject a plethora of job opportunities often wonder whether their lack of success in finding The One is the result of being “picky.” Or perhaps … too picky.
So is it?
It depends. Being picky is not necessarily a negative thing. In fact, being a discerning professional can enhance the quality of a career. But there are circumstances where pickiness is misguided and is the product of ignorance, lack of self-awareness, entitlement, fear and/or unrealistic expectations. It is in these circumstances that a professional can sabotage his/her own ability to move forward in a positive direction … and be happy.
So in order to determine whether your attitude and criteria need an adjustment, ask yourself the following questions:
“Do I know …”
- Specifically … what qualities in a role will make me happy? What would make me unhappy?
- Specifically … what qualities in a culture would make me happy/unhappy?
- What qualities in a role and culture are must-haves and nice-to-haves?
- My top criteria for my next manager?
- What my career goals are in three years? Five years? And beyond?
- What types of roles would move me closer to my career goals?
- … and appreciate what the market is telling me about my marketability for such roles?
- How much money I want to make?
- How much money I need to make?
- If I'm willing to be flexible on compensation. And if so, how flexible? Numbers please.
- If my compensation and title requirements align with what the market is offering lawyers with my level of experience? If it does not, what is the disparity and how realistic is it to close the gap?
- The detailed reasons why the prior opportunities were not appealing to me, and consequently, not “perfect”?
- If those reasons were deal breakers for my happiness or did they fall in the “nice-to-haves” category?
- What my biggest fears and anxieties are in the job search process as well as for me professionally?
- The reasons behind my desire to leave my current job?
- If I'm really committed to leave my current job?
- There is no such thing as “perfect”?
The answers to the questions above will shed light on your understanding of yourself, the market and your place in it. And will clarify whether your criteria are driven by something less virtuous—or if they're right on target. If the former, you'll need to adjust accordingly and develop a different perspective using a new lens if you want to better prepare yourself to capitalize on future opportunities. If your assessment demonstrates that you have an excellent grasp of your professional needs and the market—and your expectations are reasonable—then stay the course and move forward with confidence and self-assurance. And do not settle.
Seeking greener pastures can be an arduous exercise for the professional who seeks them. And self-doubt can creep in if finding the right role proves elusive over time … even if the result is by choice. In this scenario, some lawyers question whether their pickiness is the culprit for failure. But in order to truly know, one must go beyond the lip service of the statement and deeply examine whether his/her criteria is compromised … or right where it should be. Either way, the outcome will benefit your candidacy and enable you to get another step closer to saying “I do.”
Julie Q. Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readYelp Sues Google for Alleged Antitrust Violations, Citing Previous 'Watershed' Government Ruling
There's Something in the Water: San Diego Is Once Again a Hot Market for National Law Firms
6 minute readWhat Happens When You Go Viral? How a Law Firm Associate Manages Her Social Media Success
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Learning From Experience: The Best and Worst of Years Past
- 2Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 3Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 4Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 5LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250