Are You Too Picky? Ask Yourself These Questions First
Being picky is not necessarily a negative thing. In fact, being a discerning professional can enhance the quality of a career.
July 03, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
I've interviewed for a lot of jobs over the last eight months. None of them were perfect so I didn't pursue them. I want to make a move, but my search is taking a long time. Am I being too picky?
It would seem that in an active legal market, finding a new job would be quick and easy … Especially if a candidate had several suitors from which to choose. But reality isn't always what it seems. And the path to pulling the trigger can be filled with bumps in the road: Some outside one's control and others self-imposed.
Candidates who churn through and reject a plethora of job opportunities often wonder whether their lack of success in finding The One is the result of being “picky.” Or perhaps … too picky.
So is it?
It depends. Being picky is not necessarily a negative thing. In fact, being a discerning professional can enhance the quality of a career. But there are circumstances where pickiness is misguided and is the product of ignorance, lack of self-awareness, entitlement, fear and/or unrealistic expectations. It is in these circumstances that a professional can sabotage his/her own ability to move forward in a positive direction … and be happy.
So in order to determine whether your attitude and criteria need an adjustment, ask yourself the following questions:
“Do I know …”
- Specifically … what qualities in a role will make me happy? What would make me unhappy?
- Specifically … what qualities in a culture would make me happy/unhappy?
- What qualities in a role and culture are must-haves and nice-to-haves?
- My top criteria for my next manager?
- What my career goals are in three years? Five years? And beyond?
- What types of roles would move me closer to my career goals?
- … and appreciate what the market is telling me about my marketability for such roles?
- How much money I want to make?
- How much money I need to make?
- If I'm willing to be flexible on compensation. And if so, how flexible? Numbers please.
- If my compensation and title requirements align with what the market is offering lawyers with my level of experience? If it does not, what is the disparity and how realistic is it to close the gap?
- The detailed reasons why the prior opportunities were not appealing to me, and consequently, not “perfect”?
- If those reasons were deal breakers for my happiness or did they fall in the “nice-to-haves” category?
- What my biggest fears and anxieties are in the job search process as well as for me professionally?
- The reasons behind my desire to leave my current job?
- If I'm really committed to leave my current job?
- There is no such thing as “perfect”?
The answers to the questions above will shed light on your understanding of yourself, the market and your place in it. And will clarify whether your criteria are driven by something less virtuous—or if they're right on target. If the former, you'll need to adjust accordingly and develop a different perspective using a new lens if you want to better prepare yourself to capitalize on future opportunities. If your assessment demonstrates that you have an excellent grasp of your professional needs and the market—and your expectations are reasonable—then stay the course and move forward with confidence and self-assurance. And do not settle.
Seeking greener pastures can be an arduous exercise for the professional who seeks them. And self-doubt can creep in if finding the right role proves elusive over time … even if the result is by choice. In this scenario, some lawyers question whether their pickiness is the culprit for failure. But in order to truly know, one must go beyond the lip service of the statement and deeply examine whether his/her criteria is compromised … or right where it should be. Either way, the outcome will benefit your candidacy and enable you to get another step closer to saying “I do.”
Julie Q. Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readYelp Sues Google for Alleged Antitrust Violations, Citing Previous 'Watershed' Government Ruling
There's Something in the Water: San Diego Is Once Again a Hot Market for National Law Firms
6 minute readWhat Happens When You Go Viral? How a Law Firm Associate Manages Her Social Media Success
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250