Raiders Receiver Shares, Then Deletes, Twitter Apology After Settling Lawsuit Over Tossed Furniture
Oakland Raiders wide receiver Antonio Brown posted a note saying he was sorry Monday evening. The tweet, which is now unavailable, follows a July 2 order approving a settlement between Brown and the father of a child allegedly traumatized by him tossing furniture from Miami condo in April 2018.
July 09, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
An NFL player who had resolved a lawsuit in Miami-Dade Circuit Court might have fumbled the settlement after deleting a public apology he made to the plaintiff in the civil dispute.
Oakland Raiders wide receiver Antonio Brown posted an apology to Ophir Sternberg on his Twitter account around 11 p.m. Monday. The public apology was the result of an agreement between the parties over an April 2018 incident, in which Brown allegedly tossed an ottoman, vases and other objects from his room on the 14th floor of the Mansions at Acqualina, a luxury oceanfront condo in Miami.
“The legal dispute between Ophir Sternberg and me has been resolved, with a confidential sum of funds being donated to charity,” Brown wrote Monday night, before deleting the tweet about two hours later. “I am so sorry that an incident occurred. I apologize for any statements we made in court filings or otherwise to Mr. Sternberg and family. I wish Mr. Sternberg my best with regard to future endeavors and through this settlement seek to make amends with Mr. Sternberg and family.”
But now the deleted apology might put the settlement in jeopardy, although Brown's attorney says otherwise.
The plaintiff, Sternberg, an Israel-born real estate developer based in Miami, filed suit against the football star in August 2018. He alleged Brown committed assault and intentionally inflicted emotional assault upon Sternberg's then-22 month-old child by throwing objects out from the window of his condo.
The complaint categorized Brown's actions as the result of an apparent fit of rage and stated the flying objects nearly struck Sternberg's son. The suit contended the developer's son was left traumatized by the incident and has suffered from night terrors “every night” since, in addition to being prone to crying and outbursts.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Michael Hanzman approved a settlement between Sternberg and Brown on July 2. According to the order, the confidential settlement stipulates for Brown to provide a charitable contribution. The court order also outlines that the proceeds from the case are to be put toward a Florida Prepaid college fund for Sternberg's son.
Read Antonio Brown's now-deleted apology:
Media personnel with the NFL and the Oakland Raiders did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Brown's attorney, Fort Lauderdale lawyer Darren Heitner, said his client did not violate any terms of the settlement by sharing and subsequently deleting his apology.
“There has been no breach of the settlement agreement by Mr. Brown,” Heitner said. “Re-opening the matter would be a breach and frivolous act, and we will aggressively defend against any attempt to further litigate a closed case.”
The attorney is also representing Brown in a separate lawsuit filed against the wide receiver by the landlord of the property seeking damages caused by the incident.
Commercial litigator Hinshaw & Culbertson partner David Weinstein, who's not involved in the litigation, said it's possible Brown's deletion could constitute a violation of the settlement, depending on the parameters of the agreement.
“We've all represented clients who've had to apologize, and oftentimes what they think is an apology is not an actual apology,” he said. “Perhaps this was a knee-jerk reaction on [Brown's] part.”
As for the possibility of further litigation, Weinstein said that depends on how Sternberg's legal team chooses to react.
“It's up to the [plaintiff's] lawyers saying, 'You only got one shot. You blew it. The agreement's void,'” Weinstein said.
Sternberg was represented by Alan Kluger, a founding member of the Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine law firm. The attorney, through a spokesperson, declined to provide comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250