California Plan for Lawyer Fee-Sharing Picks Up Speed
A vote by the state bar's board of trustees marks another baby step toward reshaping law firm ownership rules and transforming legal entrepreneurship.
July 12, 2019 at 11:51 AM
3 minute read
The board of trustees of the State Bar of California voted unanimously Thursday to let the public weigh in on recommendations that would allow attorneys to share fees with nonlawyers and ultimately open door to outside ownership of law firms.
The 23-member board was responding to the work of the Task Force on Access Through Innovation of Legal Services. The group was created in 2018 to look for ways to encourage technological solutions to drive down the cost of legal work, thereby making it easier for the state's residents to secure assistance.
The state bar task force, which was split between lawyers and nonlawyers, came back with a series of recommendations that included changing bar rules to allow “technology-driven delivery systems” and permitting some degree of fee-sharing.
Joanna Mendoza, a solo practitioner who is on the board of trustees and served on the task force, said the proposals were motivated by the fact that 80% of the people in the state who need legal services are not going to lawyers.
“I think lawyers, generally speaking, have a fear of a change like this,” Mendoza said in advance of the vote. “But there's no justification not to try it.”
The task force's recommendations on fee-sharing have the widest possibility to upend the industry. Rather than agree on one definitive approach, the group outlined two prospective strategies. The more restrained option would allow attorneys to share revenues with nonlawyers only if their firm remains solely focused on providing legal services.
The bolder one would do away with the existing prohibition on fee-sharing and allow nonlawyer investment and revenue-sharing under any circumstances, as long as a firm's clients consent.
“It invites others who are not lawyers to the table to bring new knowledge, ideas, funding and ultimately change,” the task force said of the plan in its recommendations.
Some law firm observers have expressed concern that the change could open the doors for the Big Four accounting firms to enter the market for legal services in the state. But the task force, in its recommendations, said the existing justice gap was severe enough to justify the daring move.
An additional recommendation would allow lawyers to engage in ancillary law-related activities that are not regulated by the state bar. A majority of jurisdictions currently allow such work, but California does not.
After the public comment period ends, the task force will finalize its recommendations, and the board of trustees will take a final vote in January. The Supreme Court of California must then approve any changes to the regulations.
Read More
New California Task Force Looks to Tech, Regulations to Bring Access to Justice
Is Outside Ownership of Law Firms Picking Up Steam?
California Bar to Consider Changes to Nonlawyer Ownership Rules
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Senator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250