Levi Strauss Wants Neverland to Leave Its Tab Behind
Jeans giant accuses Australian clothier of infringing and diluting its famous mark by affixing a tiny tab to its pants pockets.
July 22, 2019 at 07:02 PM
2 minute read
It's just a tiny piece of cloth, measuring less than a square inch.
But the distinctive red tab Levi Strauss & Co. affixes to its jeans pockets and other garment seams has been identifying its goods since 1936. And the company doesn't like it when other clothing manufacturers—especially jeans makers—affix tabs to their own pockets.
That's led to Levi Strauss & Co. v. Neverland Online Pty, filed Friday before Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong in the Northern District of California.
The suit accuses Australia's Neverland of selling “substantial quantities of jeans, shorts, track pants, and jackets bearing pocket tab devices that are highly similar to LS&Co.'s Tab trademark … and are likely to confuse consumers about the source of Neverland's products and/or a relationship between Neverland and LS&Co.”
Kilpatrick Townsend partners Gregory Gilchrist and Ryan Bricker and counsel Gia Cincone are representing Levi Strauss.
According to their complaint Levi Strauss' national sales manager in the 1930s, Leo Christopher Lucier, proposed the idea of placing a folding cloth ribbon in the structural seams of the rear pocket. “Mr. Lucier asserted that 'no other maker of overalls can have any other purpose in putting a colored tab on an outside patch pocket, unless for the express and sole purpose of copying our mark, and confusing the customer,'” states the complaint, signed by Bricker.
The company continues to use the tab today in a variety of colors on various garments.
Neverland, which is based in suburban Melbourne, markets jeans under brands that include NXP, KSCY, and Nena and Pasadena. They are offered for sale in the United States and appear to feature a similarly sized tab, albeit white and often on the outside of the back pocket, rather than on the inside, as is typical with Levi's.
The suit accuses Neverland of trademark infringement and dilution under California and federal law; false designation of origin; and unfair competition. Levi Strauss is seeking damages and lost profits, and an order preventing Neverland from selling “any product that bears the Neverland Tab.”
An email to Neverland's general email address seeking comment was not immediately returned Monday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readAmazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
Meet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250