Judge Enters $6M Judgment Against Girardi, Firm in Loan Dispute With Funder
A state court judge in Los Angeles entered the judgment after Girardi failed to pay a portion of a $16 million settlement with litigation funder Law Finance Group. Girardi, his firm and his wife, 'Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' cast member Erika Jayne still face a lawsuit from a separate funder in Arizona over a loan more than $5 million.
July 31, 2019 at 12:45 PM
4 minute read
Updated 3:35 p.m. PST
A state court judge in Los Angeles has entered a $6 million judgment against Tom Girardi and his law firm Girardi | Keese.
The judgment, entered Tuesday by Los Angeles Superior Judge Gregory Alarcon, comes after the prominent plaintiffs attorney failed to pay a portion of a $16 million settlement he and the firm entered into with litigation funder Law Finance Group.
LFG sued Girardi and the firm in January claiming they owed more than $15 million in unpaid loans. Girardi and the firm agreed to pay $16 million to settle the dispute this spring, with the full amount coming due June 7.
According to a stipulation filed with Tuesday’s judgment, the defendants delivered LFG a $10 million check June 7 and promised to pay the remainder of the settlement via wire by July 7. According to the judgment, Girardi and the firm are in breach of the settlement agreement and are jointly and severally liable for the full amount, which will accrue interest at a 10% annual rate.
Leslie Corwin of Eisner, who represents LFG, said that his client had no comment beyond what was already in court documents.
“We stand behind everything we say in our papers,” said Corwin in a phone interview Wednesday morning.
In a statement provided by a firm spokeswoman, Girardi | Keese said that there’s nothing unusual about the funding arrangement Girardi and the firm had to cover the costs of cases handled on contingency.
“What is not common or normal is for these lending groups to file complaints and seek media attention – this is a new phenomenon we attribute to Mr. Girardi and his wife’s participation in a popular reality TV show,” the statement said, in part. “Due to the show, there is an increasing target on our backs, and we believe the recent lawsuits are rooted in a desire to take advantage of this high profile to intimidate and embarrass the firm.”
“Our reputation and our results speak for themselves. It is unfortunate that we deal with people like the Law Finance Group. Integrity is not their middle name or their first name,” the statement said.
Girardi, the firm and his wife, “Real Housewives of Beverley Hills” cast member Erika Jayne, were hit with a separate lawsuit in federal court in Arizona in May from lender Stillwell Madison. According to the Arizona complaint filed by lawyers at DLA Piper, the couple used a more than $5 million loan designated for the law firm to fund a “high-end lifestyle.” The Arizona suit claims Girardi fell behind on the Arizona loan as well and failed to inform Stillwell Madison that he was in default on the loan from Law Finance Group. According to a July 22 filing in the Arizona case, Girardi accepted service of the complaint in that case on behalf of all defendants July 17.
This report was updated with comment from a comment from Girardi | Keese.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250