Why the California Bar Director Is Mum on Exam Mayhem
Since her son is taking the exam, Leah Wilson, the California bar's executive director, has been noticeably missing from the agency's response to news that the essay topics for this week's bar exam were inadvertently disclosed to 16 law school deans.
July 31, 2019 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
Leah Wilson, the California bar's executive director, has been noticeably missing from the agency's response to news that the essay topics for this week's bar exam were inadvertently disclosed to 16 law school deans. On Wednesday the bar confirmed why: Wilson's son is taking the exam that ends today.
“The executive director has been walled off from all decisions regarding the July 2019 bar exam and was not part of the decision-making process regarding release of the subject matter topics,” the bar said in a statement provided by spokeswoman Teresa Ruano.
Ruano said Wilson's son graduated from an out-of-state law school. All 16 deans who received advance notice of the exam's essay topics July 25 lead schools located in California. One of those deans notified the bar July 27 about the improper disclosure, according to bar officials.
Although bar leaders say they have no evidence that any information was leaked to registered test-takers, they decided to provide the topics to all 9,000 people registered to take the exam via email the night of July 27.
The news regarding Wilson's son is sure to fuel more speculation, much of it on social media, that the topics were deliberately provided to the deans. Bar leaders say that's not the case and blamed the disclosure on a bar staffer who inadvertently included the information in a memo inviting deans to observe a future grading session for the July exam. That invitation is routine after exams, although in the past it has not been sent until after the exam concludes, said Donna Hershkowitz, the bar's dean of programs.
The bar offered full refunds between July 27 and July 30 to any registered test-takers who wanted to withdraw. Approximately 550 people have qualified for the refunds so far, Ruano said, although it's unclear how many of those were responding to news of the disclosure or had already decided not to take the test. The no-show rate for this week's exam was roughly 8%, up slightly from the July 2018 absence rate of 6.6 percent, according to the bar.
In Wilson's absence, Hershkowitz and Jason Lee, the chair of the bar's board of trustees, have led the agency's public response. In a 90-second video posted on the bar's website, Lee offered “my sincerest and heartfelt apology” for the early release of the topics.
“The integrity of the bar exam is our top priority,” Lee said. “We are also committed to transparency. We have called for an independent inquiry into these events with a focus on ensuring this never happens again.”
The California Supreme Court, which oversees the bar, also issued a statement Monday saying that it will ensure “a thorough and independent investigation” is conducted.
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250