Golden State General Counsel Cash In: Here's the 2019 GC Compensation Report
California's top-paid general counsel are earning more than their peers nationwide, on average. Here's a look at legal exec compensation in the Golden State—and which GCs made the most cash last year.
August 05, 2019 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
For general counsel, it seems California really is the Golden State.
Top-paid California general counsel earned an average cash compensation 7% higher than their national peers, bringing home $1,319,546 versus $1,228,526 in 2018. That’s according to The Recorder affiliate ALM Intelligence’s 2019 General Counsel Compensation Survey.
Out of the more than 400 high paid legal execs included in the survey, 54 were based in California, beating out every other state. Texas came in second with 48 and New York in third, with 32 GCs making the top cut.
The survey pulls Fortune 1000 legal executive compensation stats from 2018 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It only takes cash compensation—salary, bonus and nonequity incentive compensation, a post-Dodd-Frank Act form of performance-based pay— into account.
And its findings hold more good news for California general counsel: their average cash compensation is on the rise, up from $1,268,946 in 2017. Legal compensation consultants and recruiters said this nearly 4% increase could be tied to high demand for general counsel and a strong state economy.
“The labor market here in California, really specifically in the Bay Area and in the LA area, it’s hot,” said Todd Sirras, a managing director at executive compensation consulting firm Semler Brossy. “And having a strong general counsel—it’s a valuable position.”
That growing pay may not stem from higher salaries. The salary for the average California GC on the list actually fell from 2017 to 2018, from $573,988 to $561,192.
But salary’s slip was countered by a more than 16% increase in average bonus and nonequity incentive pay. Between 2017 and 2018, that average climbed from $779,195 to $906,729. Samantha Graham, the Westwood, California-based division director for Robert Half Legal, said increasing bonuses are a trend in the state.
“I’ve seen bonus targets go up in the last year or two,” Graham said. “At one point it was 10 to 15%. Now I’m seeing it up to 30% more often than I’ve ever seen it.”
California’s Top Earners
Two California general counsel cracked the national top 10 highest-paid list: The Walt Disney Company’s top lawyer Alan Braverman and Apple Inc.’s Katherine Adams, coming in at third and seventh, respectively.
Braverman is California’s highest-paid in-house lawyer for the second year in a row, with a total cash compensation of $6,350,213. That splits into a $1,600,213 salary and $4,750,000 in nonequity incentive compensation. Adams, the highest-paid woman general counsel nationally, made $4,884,615 in cash compensation last year, $884,615 in salary and $4,000,000 in nonequity incentive compensation.
Prologis Inc. chief legal officer Edward Nekritz came in third for California with $2,834,760, trailed by Steven Rodgers of Intel Corp.’s $2,794,300 and Jonathan Graham of Amgen Inc.’s $2,340,596. Legal execs from Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Visa Inc., Hewlett-Packard, McKesson Corp. and Qualcomm Inc. rounded out the top 10.
Seven of those companies are based in the Bay Area and half are in the tech industry. Both Sirras and Graham said that’s the industry where they’re seeing the highest GC pay. They pointed to a number of factors—tech’s high revenue, increased regulatory hurdles, policy responsibilities and tighter labor market—as reasons for the trend.
“Over a long period of time, the increases [in GC pay] will be greater than for other jobs because the market is tighter and the stakes are higher in that role,” Sirras said.
Equity Shakes Things Up
Tech general counsel, most of whom are based in California, are also more likely to receive much of their compensation in equity, Sirras and Graham said. The average stock award compensation for California GCs in the survey was $3,352,313 compared to $1,406,657 nationally.
The order of the top-paid U.S. general counsel list changes drastically when equity is a factor. With equity included, four California GCs crack the national top ten. David Drummond, CLO of Google parent company Alphabet Inc., tops the list, earning $47,282,232 last year.
Half of the top 10 becomes tech GCs, including the legal heads of Apple, Intel, Microsoft Corp. and Twitter Inc.
Sirras said equity “tends to be where you see bigger moves” in pay packages. But that trend is spreading to smaller California companies and pay packages, too, according to Graham.
“We’ve seen a lot more startups pop up and they’re getting creative with the compensation packages in terms of offering equity,” she said.
The Pay Gap Is Closer in California
There was a less than 1% difference between GC pay for California men and women on this year’s list. On the national list, male GCs earned over 17% more than female peers. California’s top GC earners list was also more evenly divided by gender, with 21 women and 33 men—40% female. Only 26% of GCs on the national list were women.
Sirras said California companies have emphasized large, diverse candidate pools when hiring to find the best candidate.
“We have more structures that allow us to get more diverse candidates coming through and we wind up with a more diverse population,” he said. “In that regard, I think California probably leads the market. The market will catch up, but California’s gone there first.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute readCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250