Burning Man Takes Legal Heat for Lack of Sign Language Interpreters
The Burning Man festival bills itself as "an exercise in Radical Self-Reliance," but two deaf California men think the organizers' decision to drop interpretive services for the deaf is a bad sign.
August 22, 2019 at 07:32 PM
3 minute read
The Burning Man festival bills itself as "an exercise in Radical Self-Reliance," but two deaf California men think the organizers' decision to drop interpretive services for the deaf is a bad sign. Melvin Patterson and Branton Stewart are suing the Burning Man Project for no longer providing American Sign Language interpreters for deaf and hard-of-hearing festival-goers. According to the suit, which was filed in the Northern District of California, Burning Man ceased such services in 2017. Patterson, who first attended the festival in 2012, had volunteered as a "Ranger" for Burning Man from 2014 to 2018. The Burning Man website defines Rangers as "participants who volunteer a portion of their time at Burning Man in service of the safety and well-being of the Burning Man community." Patterson claims that in 2016 there was a shortage of ASL interpreters at the festival and none at all in subsequent years. Patterson says he tried to work with festival organizers to try and get interpreters hired for Burning Man 2018 but was told he would instead be paired with "a partner who can provide information to you in writing at all times and with the opportunity to communicate with Ranger management should you need additional support." Patterson claims such a partner never emerged during his time as a Ranger that year. Stewart also reached out to Burning Man in 2019, proposing a plan to hire six interpreters for an average of 50 to 60 hearing-impaired participants who attend the festival each year. Stewart was told it was not something Burning Man could fund. "I would like to call your attention to two of Burning Man's 10 Principles—Radical Self Reliance and Communal Effort," a festival organizer told Stewart via email. "Through these guiding Principles, we encourage our participants to rely on their own resources in discovering Black Rock City." The suit claims violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. The plaintiffs are asking for ASL interpreters to be provided at the festival and for Burning Man to "implement policies and procedures that will ensure effective communication, full and equal enjoyment, and a meaningful opportunity to participate in and benefit from [Burning Man] services" for deaf and hard of hearing individuals. The plaintiffs are represented by Eisenberg & Baum, with Buche & Associates as local counsel. This year's Burning Man festival is scheduled to begin Aug. 25 in Nevada's Black Rock Desert. This is not the first time Burning Man has sparked litigation along with its annual fiery effigy. See the above slideshow for notable harshed mellows in the festival's history.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDel. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
3 minute readEmbracing Hybrid Work, ArentFox Schiff Downsizes LA Digs
9th Circuit Judges Weigh if Section 230 Shields Grindr From Defective Design Claims
Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250