Citi: Northern California Firms Lead Industry in First Half
Northern Californian law firms saw the most revenue and demand growth in the first half of 2019, according to a recent analysis by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
August 22, 2019 at 03:11 PM
4 minute read
Despite trailing in revenue growth in the first quarter of the year, Northern California-headquartered law firms still saw revenue growth of 6.8% in the first half of 2019, outpacing all the other regions surveyed in a recent report from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Overall, firms in California have experienced strong revenue growth in the past six months. Running neck and neck in the race, Southern California-based firms saw revenue growth of 6.6%, also exceeding the industrywide average of 4.1%.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said the revenue growth is the result of a "combination of rate increases and demand growth."
Citi surveyed a sample of 191 firms, including 77 Am Law 100 firms, 54 firms in the Am Law Second Hundred and 60 niche firms or boutiques. Among the 11 geographic regions analyzed, law firms in Northern California saw the strongest demand growth, at 4.3%, in the first half of 2019.
Meanwhile, in Southern California, demand was up 2%, coming in third among all regions. Both outperformed the industry average of 0.1% demand growth.
As another driver for the revenue growth, the lawyer billing rate for Northern California firms increased by 3.4%, lower than the industry average of 4.6%. Southern California firms, on the other hand, saw rates grow by 5.3%, above the industrywide average.
California firms' gross revenue will likely continue to grow in the second half of 2018, said Rusanow, pointing to strong inventory balances at the midyear point. The inventory for firms in Northern California increased by 11.4% in the past six months, and by 8.3% for firms in Southern California firms.
Industrywide, firms experienced inventory growth of 5.8% and a 1.6% lengthening of the collection cycle. Northern California firms' collection cycle lengthened 4.3%, the greatest among among all the regions. The collection cycle Southern California firms was in line with the national average, at 1.6% longer.
"We did see a lengthening in the collection cycle for the Northern California firms," Rusanow said. As a result, "we'll probably see even stronger revenue growth in the third quarter."
The total lawyer head count at Northern California firms rose by 5.3% in the first half of 2019, more than triple of the growth of national head count average, which was 1.7%. In Southern California, head count grew by 3.3%. Both markets have also experienced growth in equity partnership, which was up 1.9% in Northern California and 1.3% in Southern California.
As a result of the increase in head count for salaried lawyers and higher associate salaries, California firms also had higher expense growth than in other regions. Northern California firms saw their expenses grow by 8.5%, while Southern California firms experienced a 7.6% increase, both exceeding the industry average of 5.9% expense growth.
Nationwide, lawyer productivity declined 1.2%, slightly better than the 1.8% productivity decline the industry saw the first quarter. Helped by the increased lawyer head count, productivity for Northern California firms was down 0.6%. Productivity for Southern California firms was down by 1.4% in the first half of the year.
Lee Pelayo, a Palo Alto-based financial professional at Citi Private Advisory, said the growth Northern California has experienced is largely driven by the tech industry in the region as it continues to be a hub for startups, innovative ideas and innovative companies.
"We don't see that trending back, we see that continuing to grow," Pelayo said.
Read More
Law Firm Margins Tighten as First-Half Expenses Outgrow Revenue
Revenue Growth Trailed in California as Collections Slowed: Citi Report
Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Wanes, but Market Optimism Remains
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250