Citi: Northern California Firms Lead Industry in First Half
Northern Californian law firms saw the most revenue and demand growth in the first half of 2019, according to a recent analysis by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
August 22, 2019 at 03:11 PM
4 minute read
Despite trailing in revenue growth in the first quarter of the year, Northern California-headquartered law firms still saw revenue growth of 6.8% in the first half of 2019, outpacing all the other regions surveyed in a recent report from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Overall, firms in California have experienced strong revenue growth in the past six months. Running neck and neck in the race, Southern California-based firms saw revenue growth of 6.6%, also exceeding the industrywide average of 4.1%.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said the revenue growth is the result of a "combination of rate increases and demand growth."
Citi surveyed a sample of 191 firms, including 77 Am Law 100 firms, 54 firms in the Am Law Second Hundred and 60 niche firms or boutiques. Among the 11 geographic regions analyzed, law firms in Northern California saw the strongest demand growth, at 4.3%, in the first half of 2019.
Meanwhile, in Southern California, demand was up 2%, coming in third among all regions. Both outperformed the industry average of 0.1% demand growth.
As another driver for the revenue growth, the lawyer billing rate for Northern California firms increased by 3.4%, lower than the industry average of 4.6%. Southern California firms, on the other hand, saw rates grow by 5.3%, above the industrywide average.
California firms' gross revenue will likely continue to grow in the second half of 2018, said Rusanow, pointing to strong inventory balances at the midyear point. The inventory for firms in Northern California increased by 11.4% in the past six months, and by 8.3% for firms in Southern California firms.
Industrywide, firms experienced inventory growth of 5.8% and a 1.6% lengthening of the collection cycle. Northern California firms' collection cycle lengthened 4.3%, the greatest among among all the regions. The collection cycle Southern California firms was in line with the national average, at 1.6% longer.
"We did see a lengthening in the collection cycle for the Northern California firms," Rusanow said. As a result, "we'll probably see even stronger revenue growth in the third quarter."
The total lawyer head count at Northern California firms rose by 5.3% in the first half of 2019, more than triple of the growth of national head count average, which was 1.7%. In Southern California, head count grew by 3.3%. Both markets have also experienced growth in equity partnership, which was up 1.9% in Northern California and 1.3% in Southern California.
As a result of the increase in head count for salaried lawyers and higher associate salaries, California firms also had higher expense growth than in other regions. Northern California firms saw their expenses grow by 8.5%, while Southern California firms experienced a 7.6% increase, both exceeding the industry average of 5.9% expense growth.
Nationwide, lawyer productivity declined 1.2%, slightly better than the 1.8% productivity decline the industry saw the first quarter. Helped by the increased lawyer head count, productivity for Northern California firms was down 0.6%. Productivity for Southern California firms was down by 1.4% in the first half of the year.
Lee Pelayo, a Palo Alto-based financial professional at Citi Private Advisory, said the growth Northern California has experienced is largely driven by the tech industry in the region as it continues to be a hub for startups, innovative ideas and innovative companies.
"We don't see that trending back, we see that continuing to grow," Pelayo said.
|Read More
Law Firm Margins Tighten as First-Half Expenses Outgrow Revenue
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250