'I'm a Flawed Human Being,' Judge Says at Sexual Harassment Trial
Second District Court of Appeal Justice Jeffrey Johnson admitted, under cross-examination on Friday, that he made an occasional "bad joke" and might have forgotten some details, but he insisted that he did nothing unethical.
August 23, 2019 at 05:49 PM
7 minute read
A California appeals court judge facing sexual harassment allegations admitted in trial on Friday that he told an occasional "bad joke" and might have forgotten some details about an alleged incident, but he insisted that he did nothing unethical.
"I'm a flawed human being," Justice Jeffrey Johnson told Emma Bradford, a Commission on Judicial Performance examiner, at a hearing in a judicial discipline proceeding. "And my memory is not perfect."
The commission has charged Johnson with sexually harassing dozens of women over nearly two decades, including Victoria Chaney, a fellow judge on the Second District Court of Appeal. The hearing, which began on Aug. 5 and is taking place at California State Bar Court in downtown Los Angeles, should wrap up next week. Johnson, an associate justice appointed to the Second Appellate District a decade ago, faces allegations that he groped women, made sexually offensive remarks or inappropriately hugged them. He faces 10 counts of misconduct, including sexual harassment and drunken behavior. Depending on the findings, the commission could remove him from the bench.
On Thursday, Johnson denied the most serious allegations, calling some of the accounts outright lies and, at times, the product of long-held racial stereotypes of African American men.
Under cross-examination, Bradford questioned how Johnson could insist that many of the allegations were untrue when, during his March deposition, and in statements he made to the commission in September 2018, he said he did not remember them.
Johnson countered that some of the alleged behavior, even if true, did not violate the canons in the California Code of Judicial Ethics or involve his duties as a judge. Bradford disagreed, citing specific references to the canons, which state that judges should be "patient, dignified, and courteous" in performing their duties without "bias, prejudice, or harassment," including sexual harassment.
Johnson has admitted making some of the allegedly inappropriate comments but attempted to explain the behavior with more details in context. He also said he would not make those comments again, given the changes in society over the years involving sexual harassment.
In 2013, for example, he said he invited a young woman attorney, Melanie Palmer, to dinner and, later, to his chambers. The commission has alleged that he commented about Palmer's legs and that she looked fit.
"There was no appearance of impropriety to take a woman half your age back to your chambers, alone, after dinner and drinks, at night?" she asked Johnson.
"I don't think someone who's objective would reach that conclusion," he said.
In another case, he admitted that he kissed a young attorney on the lips.
"We're talking a peck on the lips," Johnson responded. "It's not a sexual act. It's an act of friendship. It's something in my community that is not at all uncommon."
On cross-examination, he admitted to making jokes that, on further reflection, were in "poor taste."
However, Johnson was quick to deny allegations that he was seen intoxicated on several occasions, including by four courthouse staff members. He maintained that he might have one or two alcoholic drinks on an occasion and blamed some of his behavior on his diabetes.
"I know that I've not been in the Court of Appeal under the influence of alcohol," he said on Friday.
Bradford, in response, introduced evidence of the numerous bars and restaurants on his email contact list. She also brought up an incident, which Johnson blamed on rumors, where a local reporter found out that a bar had kicked the judge out for being drunk and sexually harassing a member of the wait staff. Bradford said that Eric George, an attorney and the son of former California Chief Justice Ronald George, called Johnson with a warning to be more careful. (Chaney has retained Eric George, at Browne George Ross, to represent her in the sexual harassment allegations against Johnson.)
In one exchange involving questions about alleged drunken behavior at a weekend party, Bradford asked Johnson whether he told a law clerk and his wife that they needed to have sex "doggie style."
Johnson said that was at a party, on his own time.
"I would only say, that I don't think BJP or the canons were designed to be thought police," he said. "And people are allowed to have a personal life, and I don't think that comment falls within the parameters of, when I'm there as a private citizen, my duties."
The incident, though, evoked a question from one of the three special masters overseeing the trial as to whether any other members of the court were at the party. The three special masters are Justice Judith Haller of the Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Imperial County Superior Court Judge William Lehman and San Diego County Superior Court Judge Louis Hanoian.
Johnson has attributed some of the most serious allegations to lies and racist stereotypes of black men. Former California Highway Patrol Officer Tatiana Sauquillo, assigned to drive Johnson to work functions, alleged that the judge told her he wanted to "fuck her from behind," she said. Another woman, Roberta Burnette, a former partner at Dentons now at Burnette Law Firm in Los Angeles, and a musician, said Johnson told her to put her viola hands "on my big black dick."
Bradford, on Friday, attempted to discredit Johnson's insistence that he would never use such foul language, questioning him about T-shirts he made for his externs once that displayed the acronym "BAMF," which stands for "Bad Ass Mother Fucker."
"What about the word 'pussy' referring to female genitals?" Bradford asked. "Do you ever use that word in company?"
"Not that I recall," he said.
Then she asked him about using that word while interviewing a young woman, an allegation that Johnson denied.
Johnson also denied Chaney's allegation that he suggested they have a sexual affair while at a conference in Reno, Nevada. He said it was Chaney, not him, who propositioned him, telling him that she was "really good at sucking dick."
He also denied her reports that he frequently grabbed Chaney's breasts while hugging her, often accompanied with comments such as, "Mmm, you feel good."
But Bradford, on Friday, brought up similar complaints from 25 years ago, before Johnson became a judge.
Testimony wrapped up on Friday with Johnson's wife and pastor, both of whom said the judge told them his account of what happened with Chaney in Reno. His wife, Meghan Johnson, also testified about her husband's frequent community efforts: reading to children at a local elementary school, participating in a toy drive and being active in his church.
"I describe him as being very mannerly," she said. "The only person I know who refers to people as sir and ma'am. All the time. He's very kind."
Johnson's lawyers at the hearing were Reg Vitek, a shareholder at San Diego's Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, along with Paul Meyer, a solo practitioner in Costa Mesa, California. Johnson's legal team also includes Thomas Warwick Jr. of San Diego's Grimes & Warwick, and Willie Brown Jr., the former mayor of San Francisco.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
4 minute readState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1Bass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
- 2Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 Million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 3The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 4New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 5Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250