Supreme Court, State Bar Are Hiring Lawyers to Probe Exam Blunder
The California Supreme Court plans to conduct its own review of the disclosure, independent of the bar's investigation.
August 23, 2019 at 05:50 PM
3 minute read
The California State Bar has hired a former employment lawyer and mediator to investigate how the essay topics for the July 2019 bar exam were erroneously disclosed the week before the test was administered.
The bar will pay Jean Gaskill, once a partner with now-defunct Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison in San Francisco, $200 an hour plus travel, lodging and other expenses to conduct the investigation, according to an agreement between Gaskill and the bar that was released Friday.
The bar's directory lists Gaskill as an Oregon resident and an inactive California attorney since December 2017. Gaskill did not immediately return a message Friday.
Gaskill's retention by the bar does not change the California Supreme Court's plan to conduct its own review of the incident, a spokesman for the Judicial Council said.
State bar officials say the exam topics were mistakenly sent to 16 law school deans as part of an invitation to observe the test's grading process. The invites usually go out after the two-day exam is finished, but a staffer prematurely sent emails to the deans the week before the test was administered July 30 and July 31, said Donna Hershkowitz, the bar's director of programs.
After one of the deans who received the emails notified the bar about the improper disclosure, officials decided to make the exam topics public to everyone registered to take the test. That notice went out on the evening of July 28, setting off a flurry of criticism and questions from law school graduates and their deans.
The state Supreme Court "understands and shares the concerns that this disclosure has generated," the justices said in a statement issued the day before the exam. "The court will make sure that appropriate steps are taken to protect the integrity of the bar examination and identify and address any consequences."
The agreement between the bar and Gaskill, signed by Gaskill on Aug. 2, does not detail the scope of the planned investigation, only saying that the attorney will "conduct an investigation into the premature release of the July 2019 California General Bar Examination topics." No deadline is given for completing the work.
A resume provided by the bar shows Gaskill served as both a member of and chair of a committee that selected and drafted essay test questions on the California bar exam between 1975 and 2007. He also worked as an exam consultant for state bars in Ohio, Texas and Virginia for more than 23 years.
As an attorney with Brobeck Phleger, Gaskill represented a number of major corporations, including Wells Fargo & Co. and United Airlines, in employment and workplace-related litigation.
Read more:
Why the California Bar Director Is Mum on Exam Mayhem
Anger and Confusion Swirl Over Bar Exam Topic Disclosure
California Justices Want Answers After Bar Exam Blunder
California Bar 'Inadvertently' Reveals Essay Topics Days Before Exam
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInvoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute readCalifornia's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250