California Makes Noise About Antitrust Probe Into Auto Emissions Deal, Stays Mum on Tech
The U.S. Department of Justice is questioning a deal between California and four automakers to increase fuel efficiency while tech companies are coming under scrutiny from other states' attorneys general.
September 06, 2019 at 06:29 PM
4 minute read
As California leaders continue to tout the state's rigorous environmental standards and booming tech economy in the face of hostility from the Trump administration, they suddenly find themselves oddly positioned in three high-profile antitrust actions.
On Friday the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it will investigate California's deal with four automakers to increase fuel efficiency standards beyond those sought by federal regulators. The voluntary pact with BMW, Ford, Honda and Volkswagen is aimed at reducing tailpipe emissions even as the Trump administration attempts to roll back Obama-era pollution standards.
In a Sept. 6 letter to California Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols, general counsel from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency urged Nichols to "immediately … disassociate" her agency "from the commitments made by the four automakers."
The agency's "actions in furtherance of the framework appear to be unlawful and invalid," Steven Bradbury of the DOT and Matthew Leopold of the EPA wrote. "We recognize California's disagreement with the federal government's policy proposals in this area, but those policy agreements cannot justify CARB's pursuit of a regulatory approach that would violate federal law."
State officials immediately fired back against the collusion allegations with Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeting that he'd see President Donald Trump "in court."
"The US Department of Justice brings its weight to bear against auto companies in an attempt to frighten them out of voluntarily making cleaner, more efficient cars and trucks than EPA wants," Nichols said in a prepared statement that referenced the U.S. EPA administrator. "Consumers might ask, who is Andy Wheeler protecting?"
While state leaders' response to the federal threat is familiar—California has pursued more than 50 legal actions challenging Trump administration policies—their reaction to current and threatened lawsuits challenging the Golden State's tech industry has been far more muted.
State attorneys general from eight states and the District of Columbia on Friday announced an investigation into Facebook for possible antitrust violations following a $5 billion fine leveled against the social media company for allegedly mishandling its users' personal data.
A statement issued by New York Attorney General Letitia James said the inquiry will focus on Facebook's "dominance in the industry and the potential anticompetitive conduct stemming from that dominance."
Another, larger group of attorneys general Monday are expected to announce an antitrust investigation into Google, and possibly other tech companies, The Washington Post reported.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra's office would not say if he planned to join either of the legal actions.
"California remains deeply concerned and committed to fighting anticompetitive behavior," Becerra said in a statement released by his office. "Regarding this investigation or any other, to protect the integrity of potential and ongoing investigations, we cannot provide comment."
California leaders have championed Silicon Valley, a major driver of the state's economy. Tech companies, in turn, have made healthy donations to state Democrats and their party. Records filed with the secretary of state show that Facebook contributed $50,000 to Newsom's re-election campaign in June. Google gave $29,200 to the governor last year.
Becerra, who received $7,300 from Google last year, according to filings, has been more openly critical of tech companies' actions—particularly in regards to data privacy—than Newsom. He supported unsuccessful amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act that would have allowed consumers to directly sue companies such as Facebook and Google for mishandling their personal data.
"The industry is no longer a baby," Becerra said at a Washington Post forum in March. "It's time to treat the industry as an adult. So you have to act like an adult, and you have to understand there are consequences that adults face when they don't do things the right way."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Democracy? The Chatter Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Is Spurring Between Lawyers and Clients
6 minute readWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readEPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Trending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250