Google to Cease Posting French News Snippets to Avoid EU Licensing Requirement
Google will instead only show the headlines of news articles on search result pages in France, the first country to implement the EU's copyright directive.
September 26, 2019 at 04:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Google has announced that it will not pay French publishers to display extracts from their news articles. The technology company and other republishers of online news in France will shortly be required to do so under French law implementing a new EU copyright directive.
Google will instead only show the headlines of news articles, removing other information such as article excerpts and thumbnail pictures unless the publisher allows these to be displayed for free. This could reduce publishers' traffic, and hence their online advertising revenue.
The EU copyright directive, which was approved by the European Parliament in April, requires companies operating media platforms such as Google, Facebook and YouTube to obtain licenses to host content from publishers.
In passing the legislation, the EU wants to ensure content producers are paid fairly for their work and that there is legal transparency and consistency around rights in that work.
The directive states: "In order to achieve a well-functioning and fair marketplace for copyright, there should be rules on rights in publications, on the use of works or other subject matter by online service providers storing and giving access to user-uploaded content, on the transparency of authors' and performers' contracts, on authors' and performers' remuneration, as well as a mechanism for the revocation of rights that authors and performers have transferred on an exclusive basis."
Member states have until June 2021 to implement the directive. France is the first nation to do so, as the directive will come into effect later this month.
The French media was not happy with Google's decision, and they considered it a circumvention of the European legislation, said Arnaud Touati, founder of the law firm Alto Lawyers in Paris who specializes new technologies and startups.
And it is not clear whether Google can legally circumvent the law with this action and still be in compliance with the new copyright directive.
"There is the text and the spirit of the text and it is likely that this decision would be subject to a dispute at the European [Union] level," he said.
But Richard Gingras, vice president for Google News, said the company needs to maintain trust with users and therefore cannot pay for content.
"To uphold that trust, search results must be determined by relevance—not by commercial partnerships. … That's why we don't pay publishers when people click on their links in a search result," he said.
"Google helps publishers and journalists by helping people find news content and sending them to news sites. In the world of print, publishers pay newsstands to display their newspapers and magazines so readers can discover them. Google provides this benefit to publishers at no cost."
Google's decision in France follows soon after another blow for online publishers in the EU. A consortium of German newspaper and magazine publishers earlier this month lost a lawsuit they brought against Google claiming that the technology company was required under German copyright law to pay for the use of article extracts on Google News.
The EU's Court of Justice ruled that the German legal provision in question was not valid because the European Commission had not been officially notified of it.
In 2014, Google removed Spanish publishers from Google News and closed Google News' operations in Spain after a law was passed that required it and other content platforms that display links to and extracts of news articles to pay fees to the relevant publishers to do so.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage LLC in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
Perkins Coie Lures Former Longtime Wilson Sonsini Tech Transactions Partner
Trending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250