DLA Piper Partner in Silicon Valley Accused of Sexual Assault in EEOC Claim, Open Letter
Partner Vanina Guerrero alleges that after Louis Lehot, the co-managing partner of the DLA's Silicon Valley office, recruited her to the firm in 2018, he forced himself on her and engaged in other inappropriate conduct that the firm is forcing her to litigate in secret.
October 02, 2019 at 01:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A junior partner at DLA Piper has accused the co-managing partner of the firm's Silicon Valley office of sexually assaulting her multiple times in the months after he recruited her to join the firm.
Vanina Guerrero lodged the allegations against Louis Lehot, who also co-chairs the firm's U.S. emerging growth and venture capital group, in an open letter to DLA Piper U.S. co-chairs Roger Meltzer and Jay Rains, asking them to release her from her mandatory arbitration agreement with the firm.
"No female working at DLA Piper, whether she works as an administrative assistant, paralegal, departmental staff employee, associate lawyer, contract lawyer, of counsel lawyer, contract partner or equity partner should be forced to litigate claims involving sexual assault and battery or sexual harassment by male lawyers in secret," Guerrero said in the letter.
Guerrero joined the firm in September 2018 as a partner in Silicon Valley, after previously serving as general counsel for both Reliance Communications, the flagship telecom arm of Indian conglomerate Reliance Group, and its internet and technology subsidiary.
In an Oct. 1 supplement to a complaint lodged with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Guerrero said that it was Lehot's promises that persuaded her to uproot her husband and two toddlers from their home in Hong Kong and move to Palo Alto, California, to take the job with DLA Piper. The attorney allegedly promised to make her part of his four-partner nucleus and share in his $22 million book of business.
But she alleges to the EEOC that on her first international business trip with Lehot in Shanghai, just weeks after she joined the firm, he forced himself on her in his hotel room, hugging and groping her before she ran from the room.
Guerrero included detailed allegations of three other alleged sexual assaults by Lehot, along with a lengthy list of sexually charged statements that he allegedly made against her. She also claimed that Lehot was a regular thrower of tantrums in the office, alleging in the letter that his bullying techniques prompted others to proactively silence themselves around her.
Guerrero also claims that initially, after each effort to initiate a sexual relationship with her, Lehot would "forgive" her for rebuffing him and act professionally again. But, she further claims in the letter, by late last winter, after Guerrero once again made clear that she would not engage in a sexual relationship with Lehot, he responded by freezing her out. Lehot allegedly sought to undermine her work on a major deal alongside a senior partner. After repeatedly informing the partner that Lehot was "terrorizing" her, and finally detailing his specific actions in July, the partner allegedly responded by saying it looked like a "he said, she said" situation and asking Guerrero to "talk it out" with Lehot and three other senior partners.
Attorney Jeanne Christensen of Wigdor said she informed DLA Piper that the firm was representing Guerrero in late July, and she claims that since that date, Lehot has continued to retaliate, dropping Guerrero from work-related emails for their largest client, for example. After he forced her to participate in a meeting, Guerrero claims she suffered a panic attack and landed in the urgent care unit of a local hospital.
Furthermore, Guerrero claims the firm has contrived alleged information about her own "inappropriate" behavior and initiated a full investigation through outside counsel.
A spokesman from DLA Piper did not immediately respond to a series of questions Tuesday.
Lehot joined DLA Piper in 2015, coming from Cooley, where he was a partner for just over two years. Before that, he practiced at Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton for less than four years, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett for just under four years, and Shearman & Sterling for five years.
Lehot did not respond to both an email and a telephone call Tuesday.
DLA Piper's policy of imposing mandatory arbitration agreements on lawyers and summer associates has previously been the subject of a pressure campaign by students at Harvard Law School.
"No victim of sexual assault or harassment should ever be denied access to our court system. DLA Piper should lead by example and do what is right for its female employees. No longer should female employees be silenced to protect its male centric leadership," Christensen said in an email.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250