MDL Panel Sends Lawsuits Against Juul to San Francisco
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation also ordered lawsuits brought over Capital One's data breach to be sent to Alexandria, Virginia.
October 02, 2019 at 01:40 PM
4 minute read
A federal judicial panel has ordered that lawsuits against Juul Labs Inc. go to San Francisco, home to the electronic cigarette maker's headquarters, before U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California.
Wednesday's order, by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, comes after dozens of lawyers packed a Los Angeles courtroom last week to argue over which judge should oversee about 55 lawsuits against Juul. Juul and some plaintiffs attorneys had supported Orrick, who is overseeing several of the cases, but some had preferred sending the cases to New Jersey before U.S. District Judge Brian Martinotti of the District of New Jersey.
"JLI is headquartered in that district, and it represents that most of the key evidence and witnesses are located there," wrote MDL panel chairwoman Sarah Vance, who sits on the Eastern District of Louisiana. Orrick, she wrote, "has been presiding over most of the California actions since they were filed and already has ruled on two motions to dismiss."
The lawsuits include class actions, which alleged Juul's misleading marketing failed to disclose the nicotine in its products, causing young adults and teenagers to get addicted, and personal injury cases focused on pulmonary disease, seizures and other serious health problems. Last week, Juul announced that CEO Kevin Burns would step down immediately and the company would suspend all advertisements of its products. The new CEO, K.C. Crosthwaite, comes from Philip Morris USA parent corporation Altria Group Inc., which has a 35% stake in Juul.
Juul also faces mounting regulatory pressure from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is investigating Juul's marketing claims to children, as have many state attorneys general.
In a separate order Wednesday, the MDL panel sent more than 50 lawsuits against Capital One over last year's data breach to U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia. The Capital One breach compromised the personal information, including Social Security numbers, of 100 million customers in the United States and 6 million in Canada.
Capital One is based in McLean, Virginia—a fact noted by the panel in its decision. The panel also said documents and witnesses were in that district.
"Moreover, the AWS defendants maintain that relevant witnesses and evidence are located in an AWS facility located in Northern Virginia," Vance wrote, referring to Amazon Web Services, where the alleged hacker, Paige Thompson, previously worked, and where the hacked data was stored on a cloud-based system.
Trenga, who sits in Alexandria, Virginia, previously oversaw multidistrict litigation against Lumber Liquidators over its wood flooring.
In a third order, the panel sent four patent infringement cases involving a shoulder rehabilitation device made by Atlanta's OneDirect Health Network Inc. to a judge in the Southern District of Florida who is new to multidistrict litigation. That district, the panel wrote, is where the inventor and original distributor were located.
The panel's pick, U.S. District Judge Roy Altman of the Southern District of Florida, worked at Miami's Podhurst Orseck before President Donald Trump appointed him to serve on the Fort Lauderdale, Florida, federal bench, which he joined April 9. He also oversaw the criminal case against Yujing Zhang, a Chinese national, convicted last month for trespassing and lying to federal agents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort.
Altman is 37 years old.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250