State Bar Gets 2 Years to Develop Anti-Bias Training for Lawyers
The new law stems from a package of bills pushed by Democrats this year aimed at reducing implicit bias among professionals and institutions.
October 02, 2019 at 07:02 PM
3 minute read
The state bar will have two years to develop rules requiring attorneys and court employees to complete courses helping them identify any unconscious prejudices under legislation signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday.
Assembly Bill 242 also authorizes the Judicial Council to create similar training programs for judges and subordinate judicial officers. Such training is already mandatory for Judicial Council employees, and Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has endorsed such coursework for judges, telling lawmakers in her State of the Judiciary speech in March that she plans to take the first class when it becomes available.
The new law stems from a package of bills pushed by Democrats this year aimed at reducing implicit bias among professionals and institutions. Related legislation signed by Newsom will also require continuing education classes on bias for doctors and nurses.
"There will be no training that will completely eradicate everything, particularly implicit or unconscious bias," the author of AB 242, Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager-Dove, D-Los Angeles, said at a hearing on her legislation in June. "I am not going to suggest this bill is a silver bullet for that. But it certainly will work to address the bias in ways that will help folks counteract it and embrace it and acknowledge it so that they can be better at their jobs."
The legislation was backed by a dozen legal groups, including Disability Rights California, the Legal Aid Association of California and the National Center for Lesbian Rights. There was no registered opposition.
The new law gives the state bar until Jan. 1, 2022, to come up with rules requiring continuing mandatory legal education for all licensees on "implicit bias and the promotion of bias-reducing strategies to address how unintended biases regarding race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or other characteristics undermine confidence in the legal system." The law does not mandate the amount of training attorneys will be required to undergo.
Court workers who interact with the public on matters before the court will be required to complete two hours of implicit bias training every two years.
The state bar reported to the Legislature in March that it had provided an education class on implicit bias to its employees and planned to deliver it to volunteers serving on the agency's many committees.
Read more:
California Lawyers Slam Bar Proposals for Fee-Sharing, Nonattorney Ownership
New Law Blocks State Bar's Access to Applicants' Mental Health Records
California's Indigent Are Not Finding Legal Help, Bar Study Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInvoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute readCalifornia's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250