MGM Agrees to Pay Up to $800M to Settle Las Vegas Shooting Lawsuits
The total settlement is between $735 million and $800 million, according to plaintiffs lawyers, who announced the deal Thursday. It resolves lawsuits brought over the 2017 mass shooting at MGM's Mandalay Bay Casino in Las Vegas.
October 03, 2019 at 12:02 PM
6 minute read
MGM Resorts International has agreed to pay up to $800 million to settle lawsuits brought by victims of the 2017 mass shooting at its Mandalay Bay Casino in Las Vegas, according to plaintiffs lawyers, who announced the deal Thursday.
The total settlement is between $735 million and $800 million, depending on the number of victims who participate, according to a release by Las Vegas-based Eglet Adams, which represents 2,500 victims and their families. At a press conference on Thursday, Robert Eglet, name partner at Eglet Adams, said the total number of potential claimants was about 4,400, represented by more than 65 law firms, and he believed that "quite frankly, that all claimants, represented claimants, will choose to participate."
He lashed out at Congress for failing to overturn a federal statute that allows gun manufacturers to be immune from product liability lawsuits.
"If you want to do something about the gun violence in this country, repeal that statute and let American juries decide if the risk of putting these types of weapons of mass murder on the streets outweighs the benefit," he said. "I have a feeling American juries would stop the sale, and cause a lot of incentive to the gun manufacturers to stop making and selling these types of weapons in this country, if they were subject to liability just like every single other industry in our country is for their negligence or their defective products."
"That," he said, "is the quickest way and swiftest way to try to at least put a dent in this problem."
MGM, which is the largest employer in Nevada, admitted no liability as part of the settlement.
"Our goal has always been to resolve these matters so our community and the victims and their families can move forward in the healing process," MGM Resorts CEO and Chairman Jim Murren said in a statement. "We have always believed that prolonged litigation around these matters is in no one's best interest. It is our sincere hope that this agreement means that scenario will be avoided."
Eglet, in an unusual move, heaped praise on MGM.
"What MGM has done here through this process, and through this mediation, represents the highest standard of corporate citizenship I have ever seen in my career," he said. "They are, quite frankly, a shining example of what corporations can do in America, in that they can both do well for their shareholders as well as do well for the community. And MGM proved that in this case."
On Oct. 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock was a guest on the 32nd floor of the MGM's Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino hotel, where he stockpiled an arsenal of weapons used to fire at concertgoers at the Route 91 Harvest Festival. He killed 58 people and injured hundreds.
Lawsuits filed over the shooting are mostly in Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, but MGM filed nine lawsuits in federal courts against 1,977 victims who either sued or threatened to sue the company for failing to provide security that would have prevented the shooting. The suits sought declaratory relief that MGM was not liable for injuries or deaths.
The settlement resolves those declaratory relief actions, according to Eglet Adams.
MGM's suits, filed across the country, struck an immediate backlash, both on social media for targeting the shooting's victims and from plaintiffs lawyers who accused the company of forum shopping. At Thursday's press conference, Eglet acknowledged that his views about MGM had changed since then—he said he would even put his family up in one of their hotels.
"Last year, I was the loudest voice in the country," he said, "saying negative things about MGM when they sued a number of the victims in this case. And MGM, at that time, you recall, kept saying to the press we just want to figure out a way to get all these cases in one venue to work toward resolution of litigation. I didn't believe them. I said I don't believe that's true. But I was wrong. I was wrong. And they proved that to me in the first several weeks of this mediation. It became very clear that was their intention."
The value of the settlement is in line with MGM's estimate filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission earlier this year. At the time, MGM notified investors that it had $751 million of insurance coverage available.
Two other lead plaintiffs attorneys, Mark Robinson of Robinson Calcagnie in Newport Beach, California, and Kevin Boyle of Los Angeles-based Panish Shea & Boyle, served as lead plaintiffs attorneys in the deal. The law firms involved in the settlement represent "substantially all plaintiffs in litigation," according to Eglet Adams. In court records, MGM had estimated that as many as 22,000 victims could sue over the shooting.
But the statute of limitations to sue MGM ran out on Tuesday, the two-year anniversary of the shooting, lawyers said.
Neither Eglet nor Boyle, reached after the press conference, could say how much of the settlement would end up going to attorney fees and emphasized that each claimant would have separate arrangements with their lawyers. Eglet also couldn't give an average payout to the victims, who must opt into the settlement, and said that third party administrators would determine the individual claimant amounts. He expected the first checks to go out by the end of next year.
Eglet praised the work of two mediators in the settlement: Former Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Louis Meisinger and former Clark County District Court Judge Jennifer Togliatti.
Brad Brian of Munger, Tolles & Olson in Los Angeles represented MGM.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Trending Stories
- 1How My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
- 2A&O Shearman's Former U.S. Co-Chair to Leave Partnership
- 3Hit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
- 4Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
- 5GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250