'Being Open to Opportunities': Credit Karma Chief Legal Officer Discusses Path to In-House Practice
Susannah Stroud Wright has used what she learned as a Big Law attorney and prosecutor to help build Credit Karma's robust compliance program.
October 09, 2019 at 01:01 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Credit Karma Inc. general counsel Susannah Stroud Wright has drawn from her experiences as a Big Law attorney, prosecutor and lawyer for Tesla Inc. and its subsidiary SolarCity Corp. to help build a robust compliance program for the personal finance company.
Wright joined Credit Karma in 2017 as the San Francisco-based firm's first chief lawyer. She arrived at the company after having served as an associate GC for Tesla and as a deputy GC for SolarCity.
Before she went in-house, Wright had two stints in Big Law—first at Alston & Bird and later with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher—separated by three years of service as a prosecutor for the Fulton County District Attorney's Office in Georgia.
Wright spoke with The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel about her winding path to the in-house world and the compliance lessons she learned along the way. The conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
Corporate Counsel: You've had an interesting career. What spurred that last move from Big Law to the in-house world?
Susannah Stroud Wright: If you had asked me way back when if I would have ever found myself in-house, much less as a chief legal officer, I would've said you were out of your mind. That was never on the planned path. But what happened is a series of opportunities. That's one thing I try to tell the folks that I mentor and work with. Don't feel that you have to adhere to a strict five-year plan. The most important thing is being open to opportunities and focus on what matters most to you and where you love to develop skills. Making the switch, when I first went in-house at SolarCity, it came out of the blue. I actually went in talking to Seth Weissman, the general counsel there … perhaps thinking that I would get him as a client while I was at Gibson. He was an excellent salesperson. What I found out about going in-house is it appealed to so much of what I loved, which was working with people, persuading people, helping solve really big problems and building things.
CC: What do you bring from your experiences as a prosecutor and in Big Law to the GC role?
SSW: Having been a prosecutor and having done trial work and also doing trial work at large firms and investigations, I have a big-picture outlook of understanding what is something that's really going to matter to regulators or to others. What are the things that are embodied in the spirit of the law that are the big-picture items that we need to absolutely make sure we're zeroed in on. For a lot of the industries that I've been working at in-house, the law is unclear in a lot of areas. These are disruptive industries that are doing brand new things, things that a lot of the existing laws were not created to address. So there can be a lot of confusion and lack of clarity. A lot depends on thinking about, "OK, what's in the best interest of our members and the consumer. What's really the right thing to do here?" Having been on the side of prosecuting people who have done something really wrong, I have a good sense of where a lot of those lines are and I understand what a regulator is going to care about the most.
CC: At Credit Karma, compliance and regulatory oversight is a significant part of your role. What are the primary compliance-related challenges that you're facing at the moment and how are you addressing those challenges?
SSW: We're always making sure that we're complying with the consumer protection laws in place. Everything we put in front of our members, we want to make sure that it's clear, simple and easy to understand. The other big area that's always top of mind is on the security side. How are we making sure that we are keeping all of our members' data safe? We spend an enormous amount of time, energy, money and resources on security. And then also ensuring that with all the changes to privacy regulations that there's nothing we need to worry about. We're very fortunate that the company was built with the concept of privacy by design in its very core.
CC: Credit Karma embeds in-house lawyers called product counsel within the company's product teams to ensure compliance. How does that work?
SSW: We have those product counsel for our different product verticals. For instance, with our new savings product, the savings product counsel will be embedded with that team and working with them day in and day out on the launch of that product. They're involved from day one. Because we are so highly regulated, we always need to make sure we have a clear idea of what the rules of the road are before we try and go down a certain path. That's where the product counsels really become essential in helping as we're developing a product road map. What our product counsel do is they provide advice on the structure of the product. They work with our regulatory counsel on what the regulatory requirements may be, what are the particular areas that might present challenges. And also sometimes they're serving as a bit of a traffic cop to make sure that we're getting advice from the right subject matter experts. Our product counsel also become the point of contact for our business partners. They know that that's the person to go to who can help them get answers for any type of question that comes up. The product counsel is there in all the meetings from the first step, so they really understand what the business is trying to do, rather than being on the tail end where someone comes at the last minute saying, "Can you sign off on this?"
CC: Did you have to hire additional in-house lawyers to serve as product counsel or were they recruited from the existing team?
SSW: We had some folks when I got here who were focused on certain product verticals, and we just formalized that program a bit more. We have grown the legal team over the past two and a half years in a variety of areas, including the product counsel area.
CC: What spurred the idea to have product counsel?
SSW: It was something that I had seen work really effectively at SolarCity and Tesla, and it kind of developed organically over time where we'd have folks on the legal and compliance team be the go-to people for certain issues, certain products. They had developed a lot of expertise in a particular product. What I really wanted to do here at Credit Karma was have a formalized way of developing that and making sure that there was that close partnership and we had an efficient means of doing that.
CC: How has your role changed or evolved since you joined Credit Karma?
SSW: When I first joined, a lot of it was about building up the team and setting up infrastructure and getting the right guardrails in place. Now it's really thinking about how can we scale even better. Thinking about the future and how do we proactively get involved so we can help identify those invisible potholes, knowing where the company is going and helping to plan not just for what's right in front of us but planning for the next five years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250