Juul Hit With First Wrongful Death Lawsuit
A Florida woman said she was "sentenced to a life of sadness" after her 18-year-old son died due to electronic cigarettes, according to the lawsuit filed Tuesday by Levin Simes Abrams in California.
October 15, 2019 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
The mother of an 18-year-old boy who died after using electronic cigarettes for three years filed the first wrongful death lawsuit against Juul Labs Inc. on Tuesday.
The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, for the death of Daniel David Wakefield, a resident of Pasco County, Florida, who died in in August of last year. His mother, Lisa Marie Vail, the plaintiff in the complaint, alleged that her son began using Juul's e-cigarettes, which he believed to be safe, at age 15. Now, the complaint says, she is "sentenced to a life of sadness."
"Juul claims that its product was intended to help existing, adult cigarette smokers. However, Juul intentionally targeted our youth beginning in 2015 with improper marketing and lies, going to so far as to give its product away for free to minors without verifying their age," wrote Vail's law firm, Levin Simes Abrams, in a statement. "In doing so, Juul single-handedly created an epidemic of young users with unprecedented levels of daily nicotine addiction."
Partners Mahzad Hite, Rachel Abrams, Sara Craig and Angela Nehmens filed the suit. The San Francisco-based firm claims it has dozens of lawsuits pending against Juul in federal and state courts.
"It is our hope that by bringing cases like that of Daniel Wakefield's to light, the public becomes aware of the serious—and sometimes fatal—hazard of Juul vapor smoke," the firm's statement says. "We also hope our work will trigger meaningful changes in Juul's corporate conduct, including taking responsibility for its role in creating this epidemic."
Juul spokesman Ted Kwong and its lawyer, Austin Schwing, of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, did not respond to a request for comment.
As of Oct. 8, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that e-cigarettes caused 26 deaths in 21 states and nearly 1,300 "lung injury cases" nationwide.
The case adds more legal troubles for San Francisco-based Juul, which also faces government investigations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general. Last month, Juul announced that CEO Kevin Burns would step down immediately and the company would suspend all advertisements of its products. The new CEO, K.C. Crosthwaite, comes from Philip Morris USA parent corporation Altria Group Inc., which has a 35% stake in Juul.
More than 60 lawsuits, some of which name Altria as an additional defendant, have alleged injuries in the form of addictions and various illnesses, like pulmonary disease and seizures, or consumer fraud on behalf of classes of consumers. Earlier this month, three school districts, represented by Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles and Wagstaff & Cartmell, sued Juul for increased costs associated with the rise in e-cigarette use among their students.
On Oct. 2, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that lawsuits against Juul go before U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California.
According to Tuesday's lawsuit, Wakefield was a healthy teenager doing well in school until he began using Juul's e-cigarettes. He became addicted, at one point throwing a mini refrigerator from the top floor of his home because he was unable to vape. Within a year, he ended up in the hospital for three days due to "breathing and lung complications."
He was staying at his dad's house when he died in his sleep from "breathing complications."
The suit alleged claims including strict products liability, gross negligence, wrongful death and California's consumer fraud law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250