Juul Hit With First Wrongful Death Lawsuit
A Florida woman said she was "sentenced to a life of sadness" after her 18-year-old son died due to electronic cigarettes, according to the lawsuit filed Tuesday by Levin Simes Abrams in California.
October 15, 2019 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
The mother of an 18-year-old boy who died after using electronic cigarettes for three years filed the first wrongful death lawsuit against Juul Labs Inc. on Tuesday.
The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, for the death of Daniel David Wakefield, a resident of Pasco County, Florida, who died in in August of last year. His mother, Lisa Marie Vail, the plaintiff in the complaint, alleged that her son began using Juul's e-cigarettes, which he believed to be safe, at age 15. Now, the complaint says, she is "sentenced to a life of sadness."
"Juul claims that its product was intended to help existing, adult cigarette smokers. However, Juul intentionally targeted our youth beginning in 2015 with improper marketing and lies, going to so far as to give its product away for free to minors without verifying their age," wrote Vail's law firm, Levin Simes Abrams, in a statement. "In doing so, Juul single-handedly created an epidemic of young users with unprecedented levels of daily nicotine addiction."
Partners Mahzad Hite, Rachel Abrams, Sara Craig and Angela Nehmens filed the suit. The San Francisco-based firm claims it has dozens of lawsuits pending against Juul in federal and state courts.
"It is our hope that by bringing cases like that of Daniel Wakefield's to light, the public becomes aware of the serious—and sometimes fatal—hazard of Juul vapor smoke," the firm's statement says. "We also hope our work will trigger meaningful changes in Juul's corporate conduct, including taking responsibility for its role in creating this epidemic."
Juul spokesman Ted Kwong and its lawyer, Austin Schwing, of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, did not respond to a request for comment.
As of Oct. 8, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that e-cigarettes caused 26 deaths in 21 states and nearly 1,300 "lung injury cases" nationwide.
The case adds more legal troubles for San Francisco-based Juul, which also faces government investigations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general. Last month, Juul announced that CEO Kevin Burns would step down immediately and the company would suspend all advertisements of its products. The new CEO, K.C. Crosthwaite, comes from Philip Morris USA parent corporation Altria Group Inc., which has a 35% stake in Juul.
More than 60 lawsuits, some of which name Altria as an additional defendant, have alleged injuries in the form of addictions and various illnesses, like pulmonary disease and seizures, or consumer fraud on behalf of classes of consumers. Earlier this month, three school districts, represented by Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles and Wagstaff & Cartmell, sued Juul for increased costs associated with the rise in e-cigarette use among their students.
On Oct. 2, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that lawsuits against Juul go before U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California.
According to Tuesday's lawsuit, Wakefield was a healthy teenager doing well in school until he began using Juul's e-cigarettes. He became addicted, at one point throwing a mini refrigerator from the top floor of his home because he was unable to vape. Within a year, he ended up in the hospital for three days due to "breathing and lung complications."
He was staying at his dad's house when he died in his sleep from "breathing complications."
The suit alleged claims including strict products liability, gross negligence, wrongful death and California's consumer fraud law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250