Alternative Legal Service Providers of the Year: Elevate Services
Elevate has partnered with tech companies, including Dolby, Juniper Networks, and NetApp, to review and modernize processes within the legal function.
October 22, 2019 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
Legal process outsourcing pioneer Elevate has partnered with tech companies, including Dolby, Juniper Networks, and NetApp, to review and modernize processes within the legal function. For example, Elevate found that senior-level Juniper attorneys were reviewing 600 Gifts Travel & Entertainment requests and over 600 Marketing Development Funds per quarter. Elevate helped reduce costs by one-third by creating a new structure where only high-risk matters are escalated for review. Kunoor Chopra, Elevate's vice president legal services and co-founder, discussed the company's model and the market reaction to Elevate from clients with The Recorder after being named the LPO of the year as part of the California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards.
The Recorder: How do you describe Elevate's value to a potential client who has never used your services before in 75 words or less?
Kunoor Chopra: Elevate has been a leader of legal innovation since its inception, and helped define what was once known as the 'LPO' sector from the early 2000s when our management team founded LawScribe and Integreon. Today, we set the standard for what it means to be a Law Company, offering a broad suite of solutions combining people, technology, process and data empowering law departments and law firms to modernize the practice and business of law.
Who is your target customer? How satisfied are you with market awareness of you and your services within that audience?
As "The Law Company" (a market segment our management team founded, defined, and developed), Elevate provides Fortune 500 legal departments and top-tier law firms with a broad range of technology-enabled services, consulting, and technology point solutions that help to increase efficiencies, improve outcomes, and lower legal costs. Our services offering is the most extensive in the legal industry, making it a "one-stop" provider for organizations seeking a coordinated blend of strategic consulting, operational excellence, legal technology, and managed legal services. Through working with Elevate, our customers gain insights into the latest global best practices of similarly situated legal departments around the world and avoid the pitfalls we have observed and experienced.
Since many of our founders had built prior companies and had solid reputations in the legal vertical, Elevate received market attention almost from its inception. There was some confusion in the market, however, around the areas we supported due to our broad portfolio of offerings. In the last couple of years, we have definitely solidified our reputation as a top law company provider due to the quality of support we have provided our customers. In fact, the 2017 CLOC State of the Industry Survey mentioned Elevate as the most used alternative service provider. As we mature, the market is also gaining a better understanding of our full suite of offerings, although, since many customers are buying only one area of support, they may not appreciate the full complement of services we offer. We are definitely working on creating better awareness there.
What has the market come to trust an alternative legal service provider like you to handle? What tasks will take some more convincing?
Elevate helps our customers:
- identify opportunities for service improvement and enhancement, as well as financial and operational efficiencies, through the optimized leverage of resources, expertise, tools, and process in business and legal services such as litigation, contracts, M&A, compliance, and IP;
- identify and prioritize key transformation areas through the use of legal technologies or increased legal shared services;
- enhance service delivery and operating processes by adopting a world-class operating and coverage model, legal operations services, business intelligence systems, and increased focus on managing by metrics;
- optimize spend with law firms via best-in-class cost containment and financial management tools and techniques; and
- implement strategic service improvement, modernization, and transformation, leveraging new technology where appropriate, in a manner that is pragmatic, realistic and achievable (in particular, whether any technologies offer opportunities to integrate teams horizontally).
What will take more convincing is to get the law firms and certain industries to allow law companies to seamlessly, through their law firm affiliations, provide end-to-end practice of law and legal support. For instance, through our affiliation with a law firm, ElevateNext, Elevate has the capability to provide full litigation and transactional support, including the practice of law, often on a fixed fee or other alternative fee structures.
Although we support both corporate legal departments and law firms, some law firms are resistant to leverage what we can offer for the greater good (to service their corporate clients). The relationship works best when we partner with our customers to enhance the services they provide to their clients by introducing new efficiencies, augmenting their team through flexible resourcing and strategically implementing the latest technologies so they can focus on higher-value work.
With respect to service areas, there are certain industries that are comfortable with obtaining support globally, and others such as Pharma and Healthcare who are more comfortable with onshore support. They can benefit significantly from leveraging global support options.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250