Letter to the Editor: Loftus a First-Rate Pick to Lead the DA's Office
"Suzy Loftus' experience, competence and widespread and diverse support demonstrate she was the best choice for both the interim role, and the permanent position," write four retired San Francisco Superior Court judges.
October 22, 2019 at 05:52 PM
4 minute read
We are all retired Superior Court judges and are taking this unusual action of speaking out because our former colleagues—current San Francisco Superior Court judges—are ethically prohibited from commenting on elections, including that for district attorney. Before we were appointed to the bench, we had varied careers in the law: some of us were prosecutors, serving as assistant district attorneys and federal prosecutors, while others served in private practice. Two of us served as the presiding judge for the San Francisco Superior Court. As judges, we were assigned to the San Francisco Hall of Justice, where we tried criminal cases—from driving under the influence and auto burglaries, to domestic violence, sexual assault, rape and murder. We know the San Francisco criminal justice system.
The San Francisco DA's office handles 125 cases a week. In many, if not most cases, a San Franciscan, with a life, a family and a need for justice, becomes a victim. District attorneys enact policies to help keep us safe, standing up for justice for victims of heinous crimes as well as for accused perpetrators. They provide direction and set the values for an office that is charged with carrying out justice for the people of San Francisco. An experienced prosecutor serving as the San Francisco district attorney is critical to the efficient and fair functioning of the criminal justice system. Essential to the role of district attorney is the ability to serve as a role model and mentor to the assistant district attorneys. The district attorney must make policy decisions, balancing the competing goals of public safety and justice for persons charged with criminal offenses. In difficult cases, the district attorney must exercise prosecutorial discretion, e.g., which offenses to charge, which plea dispositions to offer to resolve cases, and when to offer leniency because a defendant's mental health or other factors warrant it.
To have credibility with assistant district attorneys, the district attorney must have had firsthand experience doing their job. It would be cold comfort to all of them to know that the life-changing outcomes from their experience in San Francisco's criminal justice system were decided by a preelection bench-warmer. Would a symphony orchestra hire a conductor who could read and compose music, but had never played a musical instrument? To lead an organization effectively one need not be a virtuoso, but must have sat in the chair of its members. Suzy Loftus' experience, competence and widespread and diverse support demonstrate she was the best choice for both the interim role, and the permanent position.
A veteran prosecutor who has managed a diverse array of legal teams, Loftus has prosecuted cases of violent crime—including elder abuse, domestic violence and gun cases. She served as assistant chief legal counsel for the Sheriff's Department, and was widely respected for her leadership as president of the San Francisco Police Commission. Prior to that, she worked in the California Attorney General's Office and in the District Attorney's Office she leads today. Loftus has the knowledge, experience, and understanding of the role of police and the job of prosecutor to address the challenges confronting our city and its criminal justice system.
Mayor Breed deserves credit for fulfilling the solemn responsibility of her office, which San Francisco mayors have properly exercised no fewer than 43 times since 1977. Similarly, Loftus deserves credit for answering the call to civic service—even in the face of foreseeable, if misguided, political attacks from her electoral foes.
It would be reckless and irresponsible to leave the District Attorney's Office vacant, or to hand its leadership to anyone other than the top choice in the judgment of a mayor vested with the legal duty to put San Franciscans—and not political campaigns—first. With questions of law and justice on the line every day, San Francisco deserves a district attorney who puts abiding civic duty over short-term political exigencies. Today, we have that in Suzy Loftus.
Signed:
Judge Katherine Feinstein (Ret.), San Francisco Superior Court, former presiding judge
Judge David Ballati (Ret.), San Francisco Superior Court, former presiding judge
Judge Kevin V. Ryan (Ret.), San Francisco Superior Court
Judge Mary Morgan (Ret.), San Francisco Superior Court
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250