Northern District Prosecutors Report Jump in Federal Defendants Charged
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California saw a 24% spike in the number of criminal defendants charged year over year, according to internal office data. The office, however, bucked a national trend by handling a slightly lower number of immigration cases.
October 22, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The number of defendants charged by federal prosecutors in the Northern District of California jumped significantly in the fiscal year that closed at the end of September, according to internal numbers from the U.S. attorney's office.
U.S. Attorney David Anderson shared the internal figures with assistant U.S. attorneys in the office's Criminal Division on Thursday and with local leaders of the six major federal law enforcement agencies Monday.
According to the internal charging statistics drawn from the U.S. Attorneys' Case Management System, known internally as Case View, the Northern District saw 671 criminal defendants charged last year, a more than 24% jump from the 540 defendants charged in the year prior.
"The 2019 case charging statistics reflect an equal balance of expanded outreach and operational improvements," Anderson said in a phone interview Tuesday.
A large portion of the increase, according to the internal numbers, came from a 35% increase in the number of defendants charged in cases involving violent crime—220 compared to 163 in the year prior. In particular, Anderson said Tuesday, that biggest contributor to the spike in violent crimes prosecution was an increase in gun prosecutions. "Last year we charged more gun crimes than any year for which I have records," Anderson said.
The overall increases come just about nine months into Anderson's tenure as U.S. attorney. Anderson has made changes to increase the speed with which prosecutors make charging decisions and resolve cases. He has also installed a "county captain" system, where certain AUSAs establish relationships with officials in the 15 counties in the district to determine when federal resources might be needed, especially in cases outside the major metropolitan centers of Oakland, San Jose and San Francisco. Anderson said Tuesday that the latest charging statistics reflect an increase in new cases filed across all 15 counties.
While the Justice Department as a whole reported a record number of immigration-related prosecutions last year, immigration prosecutions in the Northern District of California stayed relatively flat. The latest DOJ numbers show that U.S. Attorneys' Offices nationwide charged 25,426 defendants with felony illegal reentry in last year, an increase of 8.5% over the prior year. Over the same period, Northern California prosecutors charged 37 defendants with illegal reentry, two fewer than the year prior, or a drop of about 5%.
On the white-collar front, the office reported a nearly 9% jump in the number of defendants charged—111 compared to 102 in the prior fiscal year. The office in September, the last month of the fiscal year, charged 30 defendants including two corporate defendants and 28 individuals by complaint in a case accusing Amity Home Health, the Bay Area's largest home health care agency, of engaging in a multimillion-dollar scheme to pay for referrals for Medicare patients. Those 30 defendants, however, were not included in the FY2019 Case View statistics since the internal numbers count only defendants who have been charged by indictment or information.
Anderson said Tuesday that the office's "objective is to maximize our service to the community" and that the charging statistics are just one measure of that service. He said that the office has made 12 new assistant U.S. attorney hires since June and has an additional eight new AUSAs set to start in the next quarter.
"The momentum and the power reflected in that new hiring we will see in the coming year," Anderson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readReport: US Attorney E. Martin Estrada to Resign From California's Central District
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250