Northern District Prosecutors Report Jump in Federal Defendants Charged
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California saw a 24% spike in the number of criminal defendants charged year over year, according to internal office data. The office, however, bucked a national trend by handling a slightly lower number of immigration cases.
October 22, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The number of defendants charged by federal prosecutors in the Northern District of California jumped significantly in the fiscal year that closed at the end of September, according to internal numbers from the U.S. attorney's office.
U.S. Attorney David Anderson shared the internal figures with assistant U.S. attorneys in the office's Criminal Division on Thursday and with local leaders of the six major federal law enforcement agencies Monday.
According to the internal charging statistics drawn from the U.S. Attorneys' Case Management System, known internally as Case View, the Northern District saw 671 criminal defendants charged last year, a more than 24% jump from the 540 defendants charged in the year prior.
"The 2019 case charging statistics reflect an equal balance of expanded outreach and operational improvements," Anderson said in a phone interview Tuesday.
A large portion of the increase, according to the internal numbers, came from a 35% increase in the number of defendants charged in cases involving violent crime—220 compared to 163 in the year prior. In particular, Anderson said Tuesday, that biggest contributor to the spike in violent crimes prosecution was an increase in gun prosecutions. "Last year we charged more gun crimes than any year for which I have records," Anderson said.
The overall increases come just about nine months into Anderson's tenure as U.S. attorney. Anderson has made changes to increase the speed with which prosecutors make charging decisions and resolve cases. He has also installed a "county captain" system, where certain AUSAs establish relationships with officials in the 15 counties in the district to determine when federal resources might be needed, especially in cases outside the major metropolitan centers of Oakland, San Jose and San Francisco. Anderson said Tuesday that the latest charging statistics reflect an increase in new cases filed across all 15 counties.
While the Justice Department as a whole reported a record number of immigration-related prosecutions last year, immigration prosecutions in the Northern District of California stayed relatively flat. The latest DOJ numbers show that U.S. Attorneys' Offices nationwide charged 25,426 defendants with felony illegal reentry in last year, an increase of 8.5% over the prior year. Over the same period, Northern California prosecutors charged 37 defendants with illegal reentry, two fewer than the year prior, or a drop of about 5%.
On the white-collar front, the office reported a nearly 9% jump in the number of defendants charged—111 compared to 102 in the prior fiscal year. The office in September, the last month of the fiscal year, charged 30 defendants including two corporate defendants and 28 individuals by complaint in a case accusing Amity Home Health, the Bay Area's largest home health care agency, of engaging in a multimillion-dollar scheme to pay for referrals for Medicare patients. Those 30 defendants, however, were not included in the FY2019 Case View statistics since the internal numbers count only defendants who have been charged by indictment or information.
Anderson said Tuesday that the office's "objective is to maximize our service to the community" and that the charging statistics are just one measure of that service. He said that the office has made 12 new assistant U.S. attorney hires since June and has an additional eight new AUSAs set to start in the next quarter.
"The momentum and the power reflected in that new hiring we will see in the coming year," Anderson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Will Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250