Women Leaders in Tech Law: Stacey Schesser, California Department of Justice
Schesser, the supervising deputy attorney general with the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit in the California Department of Justice, has been spearheading the rulemaking process for the ground-breaking California Consumer Privacy Act.
October 22, 2019 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
Stacey Schesser, the supervising deputy attorney general with the privacy enforcement and protection unit in the California Department of Justice, has been spearheading the rule-making process for the California Consumer Privacy Act, the state's groundbreaking new privacy law. Schesser, who is among the 21 lawyers chosen by The Recorder as Women Leaders in Tech Law as part of this year's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, recently reflected on what she calls her most challenging professional year.
What's your proudest professional achievement of the past year and why?
This was one of the most challenging professional years I've ever had—and I am most proud that we have released the proposed regulations for the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) while maintaining an active enforcement agenda. It has been nonstop—from testifying before the state Legislature several times to working on the largest multistate data breach settlement ever in Equifax. I'm incredibly proud of the team that I work with every day; all that we've accomplished in advancing privacy enforcement has been a collaborative effort. Also, it doesn't hurt that the attorney general knows who I am (and can correctly pronounce my last name!).
What's your proudest personal achievement of the past year and why?
I have two young children at home and being a full-time working mother is incredibly challenging. My daughter knows that I am a "boss," and it is critical that she know that I hold that role in addition to being mom. My kids see me doing this crazy juggle—"Elmo" became a verb for me for taking those early morning/late evening conference calls to hammer out the last details in Equifax, as in "one moment, I need to Elmo my 2-year-old." While I love my job, it needs to be worth it for me to take that time away from my kids, and so I am most proud that I can keep my work-life balance in check.
What's one piece of advice you'd give to a woman starting out in tech law?
Ask the questions, figure out how it all works, and don't be intimidated by people trying to suck up all the air in the room.
What concrete steps could be made to increase the number of women in tech law?
When I first started working in privacy law, the majority of people in the room were women. As privacy becomes more intertwined with tech, it's critical that women stay in this space. The burden should not be on women to lean in, but on maintaining opportunities for women to participate and, ultimately, to lead. It matters who is at the top of organizations and who is speaking on the panels, and featuring women in these roles will help bring more women into tech law.
I feel more confident when I see other women leading, whether in government or the private sector. There also needs to be more acceptance that women are trying to balance their personal and professional lives, and giving everyone flexibility and respecting work-life balance will help increase the number of women in tech law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
5 minute readAdvisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
3 minute readSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250