Women Leaders in Tech Law: Stacey Schesser, California Department of Justice
Schesser, the supervising deputy attorney general with the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit in the California Department of Justice, has been spearheading the rulemaking process for the ground-breaking California Consumer Privacy Act.
October 22, 2019 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
Stacey Schesser, the supervising deputy attorney general with the privacy enforcement and protection unit in the California Department of Justice, has been spearheading the rule-making process for the California Consumer Privacy Act, the state's groundbreaking new privacy law. Schesser, who is among the 21 lawyers chosen by The Recorder as Women Leaders in Tech Law as part of this year's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, recently reflected on what she calls her most challenging professional year.
What's your proudest professional achievement of the past year and why?
This was one of the most challenging professional years I've ever had—and I am most proud that we have released the proposed regulations for the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) while maintaining an active enforcement agenda. It has been nonstop—from testifying before the state Legislature several times to working on the largest multistate data breach settlement ever in Equifax. I'm incredibly proud of the team that I work with every day; all that we've accomplished in advancing privacy enforcement has been a collaborative effort. Also, it doesn't hurt that the attorney general knows who I am (and can correctly pronounce my last name!).
What's your proudest personal achievement of the past year and why?
I have two young children at home and being a full-time working mother is incredibly challenging. My daughter knows that I am a "boss," and it is critical that she know that I hold that role in addition to being mom. My kids see me doing this crazy juggle—"Elmo" became a verb for me for taking those early morning/late evening conference calls to hammer out the last details in Equifax, as in "one moment, I need to Elmo my 2-year-old." While I love my job, it needs to be worth it for me to take that time away from my kids, and so I am most proud that I can keep my work-life balance in check.
What's one piece of advice you'd give to a woman starting out in tech law?
Ask the questions, figure out how it all works, and don't be intimidated by people trying to suck up all the air in the room.
What concrete steps could be made to increase the number of women in tech law?
When I first started working in privacy law, the majority of people in the room were women. As privacy becomes more intertwined with tech, it's critical that women stay in this space. The burden should not be on women to lean in, but on maintaining opportunities for women to participate and, ultimately, to lead. It matters who is at the top of organizations and who is speaking on the panels, and featuring women in these roles will help bring more women into tech law.
I feel more confident when I see other women leading, whether in government or the private sector. There also needs to be more acceptance that women are trying to balance their personal and professional lives, and giving everyone flexibility and respecting work-life balance will help increase the number of women in tech law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250