Most Innovative Emerging Company Legal Department of the Year: Coinbase
Recognizing a need in the cryptocurrency industry, the Coinbase legal team developed a tool to assess the risk that any particular asset may be a security subject to further regulatory scrutiny.
October 23, 2019 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Recognizing a need in the cryptocurrency industry, the legal team at San Francisco-based digital currency exchange Coinbase developed a securities rating scorecard to assess the risk that any particular digital asset may be a security subject to certain regulatory scrutiny. The Coinbase team has shared its scorecard with state and federal regulators and promoted it as a self-help tool to help the industry keep an eye on securities law compliance.
That work and spirit of collaboration landed Coinbase as the Most Innovative Emerging Company Legal Department of the Year as part of The Recorder's the California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The Recorder asked Brian Brooks, the chief legal officer at Coinbase, about the challenges he and his colleagues have faced in the past year.
The Recorder: What are the distinguishing characteristics of Coinbase's in-house legal department and the lawyers and staff that make it up?
Brian Brooks: The Coinbase legal team is made up of a diverse set of talented lawyers and legal professionals, who deliver excellent legal services in a hyper-growth environment to an organization with the mission of building an open financial system for the world. The legal team includes lawyers with backgrounds that range from traditional finance and regulated industries like energy and fintech, to today's top tech companies as well as the best law firms in the country.
Every day, we embody the Coinbase values: efficient execution, positive energy, continuous learning and clear communication. These characteristics are needed to provide the level of legal services the organization requires in the rapidly changing cryptocurrency ecosystem.
What was the biggest challenge your in-house team faced in the past year and how did you overcome it?
The rate of product development increased significantly in the past year, and so we had to do some fundamental thinking about the design of our organization and whether we were structured to provide the level of service the clients need. The result was a reorganization that separated the regulatory functions from the product functions and thus allows us to (a) advocate with our regulators more effectively and (b) better serve our in-house clients.
Coinbase has gone from a narrower set of product offerings in a limited geographical area, to a global group of companies offering multi-faceted crypto-related financial services. Our employee count more than tripled in less than a year. This rapid growth and expansion required the legal team to produce scalable legal solutions to help the business build the foundation of the crypto-economy and continue to move at light speed.
Reorganizing our legal team product and regulatory functions enabled us to provide the highest level of client service while simultaneously prioritizing and strengthening our regulatory relationships.
Besides that challenge, what was your legal department's most significant accomplishment of the past year and why?
Regulatory uncertainty was undermining nearly every product decision facing the company. The legal team developed a repeatable and objective process for evaluating listing potential of new assets with our Digital Asset Launch Group. We worked with independent outside counsel to refine this process, blind-testing and repeating until objectivity and consistency were established.
The legal team communicated directly with regulators to keep them informed about the process for assisting the company with listing decisions. The ultimate result is the Crypto Rating Council, a consortium of cryptocurrency companies that is navigating the uncharted waters of the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250