Women Leaders in Tech Law: Lynne Hermle, Orrick
The Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe litigation partner defeated class certification efforts in closely watched gender discrimination cases against Microsoft and Twitter.
October 23, 2019 at 12:30 PM
2 minute read
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's Lynne Hermle played a leading role in persuading judges to deny class certification motions in closely watched gender discrimination cases against Microsoft and Twitter. Hermle, who is among the 21 lawyers chosen by The Recorder as Women Leaders in Tech Law as part of this year's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, recently reflected on her latest round of high-profile litigation wins in gender discrimination cases.
What's your proudest professional achievement of the past year and why?
Trying cases with my great partners Julie Totten and Rob Shwarts, who I first knew as associates, and seeing other partners like Jessica Perry and Joe Liburt kill it as first-chair trial lawyers. And the appellate affirmances of the cases Julia Riechert and I tried for SpaceX were great too.
What's your proudest personal achievement of the past year and why?
No question—having survived the LSAT and law school application process for my only (fiercely independent) child without having a stroke or heart attack. Now I have to get through the next three years.
What's one piece of advice you'd give to a woman starting out in tech law?
Don't be discouraged by what you read about bad numbers or attitudes! I work with a huge number of tech companies, VCs and executives, and virtually all of them embrace diversity and welcome what women bring to the table—including women with strong voices. And when you get there, put your money where your mouth is—look for qualified women candidates.
What concrete steps could be made to increase the number of women in tech law?
I'm still often the only woman in client board and executive meetings, and I was fascinated by something Christine Lagarde is reported to have said—she refuses to attend meetings in which she will be the only woman. Of course, as the most powerful woman in the world's economy she has the power to issue such a mandate. But I see progress in initiatives like the Mansfield rule and other collaborations on inclusion among law firms and corporate legal departments, and I think they will get us there.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Secures Summary Judgment for RingCentral in Privacy Class Action
Regulators Say AI Enforcement Sweeps Are Reining in Hucksters, Not Innovation
Attorney of the Year Finalist: Michael Rubin, Latham & Watkins
Quinn Emanuel Staves Off Meta's Attempt to Stop £3.1B Collective Action
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 5A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250