Innovations in Pro Bono: Skadden
"While there are other school-based programs focusing on cyberbullying, social media use and related topics, this is one of the few—and we believe the first—that focuses on students' legal rights and responsibilities in the realm of social media use," says Skadden's Stacy Kray.
October 25, 2019 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's "Know Your Rights and Know the Law: Sex, Bullying and Social Media" program has been offered to thousands of students in the Bay Area to teach them their legal rights and responsibilities in the realm of social media and technology. The firm, which is being recognized for its Innovations in Pro Bono for the efforts as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, has partnered with Applied Materials, PayPal, Hewlett Packard and others in the effort. Skadden counsel Stacy Kray recently discussed how the program came about and the firm's plans for expanding it.
The Recorder: How did this pro bono project come about?
Stacy Kray: Following a focused inquiry into how Skadden attorneys could best make a positive impact in the Silicon Valley community, a group of attorneys and support staff created "Know Your Rights and Know the Law: Sex, Bullying and Social Media" almost six years ago in response to what has been widely called a public health crisis: teens engaging in negative, sometimes illegal, behavior while using social media. From "sexting" to the live streaming of sexual assault, headlines around the country continue to speak to the urgency of these often legally complex cases.
In the most tragic situations, young people have taken their own lives upon learning private photos have been disseminated. In fact, the tragic death of Audrie Pott, a 15-year-old Saratoga high schooler who committed suicide in 2012 after photos of her assault at a party were allegedly publicized to her classmates, was a driving impetus behind the creation of the program—the desire on the part of Skadden to make something positive come out of such a sad situation.
How much work have the firm and its partners put in on the project so far?
Since the program's inception, our attorneys have logged more than 5,000 hours of pro bono time in connection with this program. Members of our staff also devote significant time to running this project. Most notably, our in-house counsel partners, including attorneys from PayPal, Applied Materials, HP and many other Silicon Valley companies, also have together given many hundreds of hours to this program.
What's your proudest accomplishment of this pro bono representation to this point?
While there are other school-based programs focusing on cyber-bullying, social media use and related topics, this is one of the few—and we believe the first—that focuses on students' legal rights and responsibilities in the realm of social media use. This crisis has an especially compelling angle here in Silicon Valley, where local teens live in the world's epicenter of technology, but many never receive any formal training regarding laws regulating the use of that technology.
Accordingly, we are especially proud of the breadth and longevity of the program—we have reached more than 13,800 high school students with our interactive presentations. We routinely hear back from the students that they gleaned valuable information they previously were not aware of. For example, they come away with a firm grasp of important legal concepts as consent and accomplice liability. This program is not about peppering students with information about what they shouldn't do; rather, it is about empowering them to make smart decisions in their own lives and to be advocates for their peers. The feedback we get from the students—that little light we see go on in their eyes during the classroom presentation—that's what we are most proud of.
What are your goals for the project going forward?
To broaden our army of amazing teachers and find ways to make our message resonate even more loudly with teens in need.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250