Women Leaders in Tech Law: Victoria Maroulis, Quinn Emanuel
The Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan litigation partner continued a string of important patent wins for client Samsung.
October 25, 2019 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan litigation partner Victoria Maroulis won a rare anti-suit injunction for Samsung blocking Huawei's efforts to enforce patents in China. That win opened the door for a favorable settlement in a major cross-licensing dispute in the U.S. and China relating to portfolios of patents declared essential to 3G and 4G mobile technology standards. Maroulis, who is being recognized as one of 21 Women Leaders in Tech Law as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, recently reflected on the past year's accomplishments.
The Recorder: What's your proudest professional achievement of the past year and why?
Victoria Maroulis: Successfully resolving a major, high-profile, cross-border, patent-and-licensing dispute between the firm's client Samsung and its competitor Huawei relating to patents declared essential to 3G and 4G mobile technology standards. While we all like winning before a jury, most clients prefer to resolve the cases on favorable terms and short of trial. In this case, we fought Huawei in multiple forums including the Northern District of California, the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Patent Office, and several courts in China. By scoring a number of strategic pretrial wins—including invalidating multiple Huawei patents at the Patent Office and obtaining a rare anti-suit injunction blocking Huawei's enforcement in China—we positioned the case for a very successful pretrial resolution.
What's your proudest personal achievement of the past year and why?
Launching the second of my three kids into adulthood. My daughter has a strong moral compass, commitment to social justice, and compassion for people and animals in need. I would like to think that my parenting contributed to that.
What's one piece of advice you'd give to a woman starting out in tech law?
Learn about each tech client's business and gain understanding of their market and strategic priorities beyond your specific case or project. It is not enough to win individual cases: You need to make sure you are furthering clients' overall business objectives.
What concrete steps could be made to increase the number of women in tech law?
The key to increasing the number of women in tech law is to focus on twin goals of recruiting and promotion. The firms and in-house departments have made great strides in recruiting more women with STEM backgrounds and/or passion for technology. But that is not enough; it is crucial to make sure they thrive and progress through the ranks. That means going out of your way to give a midlevel female associate trial experience and other stand-up or client-facing opportunities. And it also means selecting women as lead counsel in high-stakes tech trials or closely watched Federal Circuit appeals, and, more generally, picking up the phone and giving business directly to female lawyers. In high-stakes technology cases, corporate boards and management tend to select the lead counsel they already know, and most of those counsel currently are not women. To effect change, boards and management need to take the next step and select the talented women attorneys who are ready and able to do the job.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250