Tech Litigation Department of the Year Finalist: Latham & Watkins
"While we tend to operate with a scalpel instead of a sledgehammer, we can wield both, and our litigators are passionate about fighting for our clients whether in court or the boardroom," says Michele Johnson, the global chair of Latham's litigation & trial department.
October 27, 2019 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
(L to R) Michele Johnson, Douglas Lumish, Colleen Smith and Elizabeth Deeley of Latham & Watkins
Latham & Watkins partners Michele Johnson in Orange County and Colleen Smith in San Diego represented biopharmaceutical company Puma Biotechnology and its CEO in the first federal securities class action to reach a verdict in nearly 10 years alongside partner Andrew Clubok, based in Washington, D.C., and New York. Partner Elizabeth Deeley teamed with Clubok to win approval of a $35 million deal to resolve long-running securities class actions regarding Facebook's IPO, setting important Second Circuit precedent on the way. Silicon Valley patent litigator Douglas Lumish teamed with partner Bert Reiser in D.C. to represent cloud networking company Arista Networks in its International Trade Commission showdown with larger rival Cisco. Lumish and Silicon Valley partner Rick Frenkel also teamed with D.C. partner Gabe Bell to secure Federal Circuit affirmance of a patent win for Facebook subsidiary WhatsApp.
That lineup of casework landed Latham as one of six finalists for the Tech Litigation Department of the Year as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The winner of the award will be announced at a ceremony celebrating all winners and finalists Nov. 6. In the run-up to next month's announcement, The Recorder recently asked Johnson, the global chair of Latham's litigation and trial department, about the firm's approach to litigation.
The Recorder: What are the distinguishing characteristics of litigators that practice at Latham?
Michele Johnson: We have a long history of representing technology companies because our fundamental belief systems are in line—we believe in innovation and results. Our litigators are creative, pragmatic and unilaterally focused on achieving the best results for our clients, in whatever form success might take.
Technology companies hire Latham litigators because we understand their truly dynamic industry and are able to pair that fluency with the vast resources of our multidisciplinary, global platform. We tailor each engagement to field the best-suited team based on experience and the dispute to be solved. While we always work to achieve the best result for our client's commercial interests—often an early dismissal or favorable resolution—we adopt a trial-ready strategy at the outset of any dispute so that we're always several steps ahead.
When a client comes to Latham for representation on a piece of litigation, what can they expect?
We deliver the highest value of client service and are committed to serving as an adviser to and partner with our clients in achieving their commercial goals. Latham is proud to have assembled a team of litigators who not only are battle-tested, but also bring a diverse range of experiences and perspectives to each matter. While we tend to operate with a scalpel instead of a sledgehammer, we can wield both, and our litigators are passionate about fighting for our clients whether in court or the boardroom.
How does your firm gauge success on any particular litigation matter?
Success is achieving the client's business goals. Success can mean securing the earliest possible resolution, the most efficient resolution or the most decisive complete victory. It's all about positioning and managing the matter in a way that best fits the client's commercial interests.
What ways is the business of litigation changing, and how are you adapting to those changes?
The business of litigation is continually evolving, and we relish collaborating with our clients to define and deliver value. Alternative fee arrangements are one of the tools that can provide a level of predictability and mutual economic benefit to the client, depending on the nature of a case. We are regularly evaluating and taking on partial or full contingency arrangements, and we maintain an open dialogue with our clients regarding flexibility and the need to creatively price services.
We are also seeing clients demand diverse teams and talent, a strategy that is fundamental to Latham's culture and how we deliver legal services. It's indisputable—diverse teams are the best teams, and we do everything in our power not only to develop and promote diverse attorneys, but to foster a culture of inclusiveness. This year alone, we've succeeded in half a dozen trials—each in a different venue, involving a different industry and a different practice—and every single one of those trials was led by a woman. We expect no other firm can say the same.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/5f/95/cceb14354b458624602dbf42bdd6/reading-holy-bible-767x633.jpg)
![Pfizer Faces Multiple Lawsuits Over Recalled Sickle-Cell Medication Pfizer Faces Multiple Lawsuits Over Recalled Sickle-Cell Medication](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2023/08/Pfizer-World-Headquarters-767x633.jpg)
![Ozempic MDL Expands to Include New Drugs, but Not New Injuries Ozempic MDL Expands to Include New Drugs, but Not New Injuries](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/394/2024/07/Ozempic-Pens-767x633.jpg)
![Pharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions Pharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/11/Pharmacist-767x633.jpg)
Pharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
- 2Upholding the Integrity of the Rule of Law Amid Trump 2.0
- 3Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 4Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 5AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250