Tech Litigation Department of the Year Finalist: Latham & Watkins
"While we tend to operate with a scalpel instead of a sledgehammer, we can wield both, and our litigators are passionate about fighting for our clients whether in court or the boardroom," says Michele Johnson, the global chair of Latham's litigation & trial department.
October 27, 2019 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Latham & Watkins partners Michele Johnson in Orange County and Colleen Smith in San Diego represented biopharmaceutical company Puma Biotechnology and its CEO in the first federal securities class action to reach a verdict in nearly 10 years alongside partner Andrew Clubok, based in Washington, D.C., and New York. Partner Elizabeth Deeley teamed with Clubok to win approval of a $35 million deal to resolve long-running securities class actions regarding Facebook's IPO, setting important Second Circuit precedent on the way. Silicon Valley patent litigator Douglas Lumish teamed with partner Bert Reiser in D.C. to represent cloud networking company Arista Networks in its International Trade Commission showdown with larger rival Cisco. Lumish and Silicon Valley partner Rick Frenkel also teamed with D.C. partner Gabe Bell to secure Federal Circuit affirmance of a patent win for Facebook subsidiary WhatsApp.
That lineup of casework landed Latham as one of six finalists for the Tech Litigation Department of the Year as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The winner of the award will be announced at a ceremony celebrating all winners and finalists Nov. 6. In the run-up to next month's announcement, The Recorder recently asked Johnson, the global chair of Latham's litigation and trial department, about the firm's approach to litigation.
The Recorder: What are the distinguishing characteristics of litigators that practice at Latham?
Michele Johnson: We have a long history of representing technology companies because our fundamental belief systems are in line—we believe in innovation and results. Our litigators are creative, pragmatic and unilaterally focused on achieving the best results for our clients, in whatever form success might take.
Technology companies hire Latham litigators because we understand their truly dynamic industry and are able to pair that fluency with the vast resources of our multidisciplinary, global platform. We tailor each engagement to field the best-suited team based on experience and the dispute to be solved. While we always work to achieve the best result for our client's commercial interests—often an early dismissal or favorable resolution—we adopt a trial-ready strategy at the outset of any dispute so that we're always several steps ahead.
When a client comes to Latham for representation on a piece of litigation, what can they expect?
We deliver the highest value of client service and are committed to serving as an adviser to and partner with our clients in achieving their commercial goals. Latham is proud to have assembled a team of litigators who not only are battle-tested, but also bring a diverse range of experiences and perspectives to each matter. While we tend to operate with a scalpel instead of a sledgehammer, we can wield both, and our litigators are passionate about fighting for our clients whether in court or the boardroom.
How does your firm gauge success on any particular litigation matter?
Success is achieving the client's business goals. Success can mean securing the earliest possible resolution, the most efficient resolution or the most decisive complete victory. It's all about positioning and managing the matter in a way that best fits the client's commercial interests.
What ways is the business of litigation changing, and how are you adapting to those changes?
The business of litigation is continually evolving, and we relish collaborating with our clients to define and deliver value. Alternative fee arrangements are one of the tools that can provide a level of predictability and mutual economic benefit to the client, depending on the nature of a case. We are regularly evaluating and taking on partial or full contingency arrangements, and we maintain an open dialogue with our clients regarding flexibility and the need to creatively price services.
We are also seeing clients demand diverse teams and talent, a strategy that is fundamental to Latham's culture and how we deliver legal services. It's indisputable—diverse teams are the best teams, and we do everything in our power not only to develop and promote diverse attorneys, but to foster a culture of inclusiveness. This year alone, we've succeeded in half a dozen trials—each in a different venue, involving a different industry and a different practice—and every single one of those trials was led by a woman. We expect no other firm can say the same.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readWilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readLos Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250