Foley Deepens IP Litigation Bench, Taking Class Action Co-Leader From Winston & Strawn
Stephen Smerek, a new partner in the firm's L.A. office, has decades of experience in IP and litigation and will help bridge the gap between those two practices at Foley.
October 28, 2019 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
Foley & Lardner has increased its IP litigation capacity in Los Angeles, the firm announced Monday, bringing on a partner from Winston & Strawn who was a co-leader of that firm's class action practice.
Stephen Smerek will focus mainly on California matters in his new role at Foley & Lardner. Most recently a 14-year partner at Winston & Strawn, where he was co-chair of the class action practice and vice-chair of the eDiscovery and information governance practice, Smerek said he was seeking a larger platform to grow a few specific areas of his practice.
"Foley gave me the opportunity to expand two aspects of my practice: consumer class action, where the firm has a nationwide base and I can focus on California litigation, and the firm also had a presence in the patent litigation space and an overall strong IP background," he said. "I identified Foley as an excellent opportunity for me to expand my practice and be a part of something that has had a lot of success nationally—and, specifically on the litigation side, in southern California—at a time that was ideal for me."
Jeffrey Atkin, managing partner of Foley's Los Angeles office, said the firm's bread and butter lies in three primary departments—litigation, IP and corporate—and the L.A. office has a deep bench in all three. In Smerek, Atkin saw an opportunity to add an attorney to Foley's roster with expertise in multiple key areas.
"In the last three years, we've been growing successfully—both laterally and organically—and we have a historically strong IP practice," he said. "We specifically looked for an IP litigator who was a hybrid to bridge those practice areas."
"Steve's experience dovetailed nicely with what we were looking for," Atkin added.
Smerek has more than two decades of experience in IP and commercial litigation, with a particular focus on pharmaceutical patent litigation and consumer class actions. He's represented clients in the pharmaceutical, medical device, technology, retail, consumer products, banking and financial services industries.
Smerek declined to name any of his clients, but he said he expects most to make the move with him to Foley, and that so far the news of his move has been well-received.
He said he does not see his practice mix changing, but he's expecting to grow both the IP and litigation sides of his practice thanks to the cohesion between Foley's offices and its emphasis on having a national practice. Specifically, he identified growth opportunities for the firm's California class action practice.
More broadly, Atkin said Smerek's hire fit into the firm's overall growth strategy, and that it was focused on building out practice areas that were already strong. For the California outpost, this means investing in healthcare, IP and commercial class action litigation.
"In the near term, we'll keep expanding those teams, not just in L.A., but across the state," Atkin said.
Firmwide, growth efforts seem to be paying off: Foley saw large gains a year after its merger with Dallas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell, which brought the firm's footprint to 24 offices in Mexico, Asia, Europe and the U.S. Post-merger, it was ranked 48th in 2019′s AmLaw 200 and boasted more than $836 million in revenue last year, according to ALM Legal Intelligence data.
As Smerek settles into his new position, he has an eye on a few trends he's noticed in his practice area. He's noticed a shift in class action cases away from statutory claims and to more general California Business & Professions Code §17200 consumer fraud claims. He said he sees this happening in consumer products, financial services, automotive, cosmetics, and other industries, and that this will likely continue.
"I also envision that fallout of new privacy and data laws in California will spark a wave of litigation over the next 18 to 36 months," he said.
Winston & Strawn did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Smerek's departure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 2'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 3Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 4Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 5Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250