Innovations in Diversity and Inclusion: NetApp
NetApp's legal department was one of the drivers in the creation of the Community of Legal Interns. CLI is an organization seeking to connect students and employers committed to increasing diversity, inclusion and innovation in the legal industry.
October 28, 2019 at 07:30 AM
4 minute read
NetApp's in-house legal department collaborated with Southern University Law Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, part of the historically Black Southern University System, and a group of companies from across the U.S. to create the Community of Legal Interns. CLI, which already has 1,100 members, roughly 35% of whom are law students, seeks to connect students and employers committed to increasing diversity, inclusion and innovation in the legal industry. The Recorder is recognizing NetApp for its Innovations in Diversity and Inclusion as part of the California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards on Nov. 6. The Recorder recently caught up with Connie Brenton, the company's senior director of legal operations, who was central to the partnership with SULC.
The Recorder: Quickly walk us through the story of how the Community of Legal Interns came about.
Connie Brenton: This year we built a partnership with Southern University Law Center to increase access, opportunity and ultimately representation from historically underrepresented groups in the legal industry. This was an initiative we designed collaboratively with partners from across the legal ecosystem in response to our belief that we, as an industry, can and must do better. I'm proud that NetApp is leading the way in this important arena.
Community of Legal Interns started with an introduction to Southern University Law Center in Baton Rouge and Chancellor John Pierre where the diverse student body works differently—from the cost of the education to the experiences and innovation afforded the students. They recruit for Grit and Gratitude and are making a difference in the lives of the students, in the community and in the legal industry.
Chronicle (an Alphabet company); Juniper Networks; Keesal, Young & Logan; LexCheck; Liberty Mutual; NetApp; and Walmart have each partnered with SULC. We are collaborating to develop a joint educational experience that is now open to ANYONE (Interns, GCs, legal ops executives, law firm partners, in-house attorneys, service providers, law school deans and career counselors, business school attendees, your internal clients, etc.).
What are the problems that the network is seeking to address?
CLI's mission is to educate, empower and establish future leaders in the rapidly changing legal ecosystem. We are creating a community-based movement to connect students and employers committed to increasing diversity, inclusion and innovation in the legal industry. CLI is seeking to address the problems of a lack of diversity, inclusion and innovation in the legal industry by fostering connections, exposing participants to thought leaders and new technologies, and providing access to rich educational experiences.
How will you measure the success of CLI?
By the end of the summer there were over 1,100 members and each of the 24-speaking series session had between 150 and 300 attendees.
CLI is a certificate program that continues to be leveraged by law schools across the country. The program is free for anyone and can be found at OurCLI.com and continues to be relevant. The entire legal ecosystem is invited to leverage the training for their organizations.
Last year, two of us visited Southern University Law Center, and seven invited companies participated on the core team. This year, 10 of us visited Southern University Law Center—members of the entire legal ecosystem—and we expect that more than 25 companies will take interns and collaborate to provide access to an entire class of Southern interns. We anticipate that more than 20 law schools will participate in the CLI program throughout the year.
P.S. We are looking for a new name. If anyone has an idea, contact [email protected]. Even before the program officially kicked off, the program extended beyond the intern community (CLI— Community of Legal Interns). This is a collaborative industry initiative, engaging law students as new active entrants to the legal ecosystem.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250