Elon Musk Loses Out on Bid to Depose Buzzfeed Reporter in Defamation Suit
A federal judge in San Francisco found that the proposed deposition wouldn't be relevant to Musk's defense that it wasn't reasonably foreseeable Buzzfeed would publish emails he designated as "off-the-record."
October 29, 2019 at 02:27 PM
4 minute read
Updated with a quote from Musk's counsel at 12:05 PT on 10/29/19
A federal judge in San Francisco will not allow lawyers for Elon Musk to depose a journalist from Buzzfeed who reported on emails the tech CEO designated "off the record" in an article that's ended up at the center of a defamation lawsuit.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on Monday found that the proposed deposition wouldn't be relevant to Musk's defense and that it wasn't reasonably foreseeable Buzzfeed would publish emails he marked as "off-the-record" and "on background" to reporter Ryan Mac, with whom the tech CEO had had no interaction prior to sending the emails.
"Reasonable foreseeability is predicated on the state of mind of the originator of the defamatory matter (Mr. Musk) and not the secondary publisher (Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed)," Corley wrote in Monday's 12-page order.
Corley, however, will allow lawyers for British cave explorer Vernon Unsworth, the man suing Musk for defamation, to depose Mac for the limited purpose of establishing that there were no communications between the Buzzfeed reporter and Musk besides the emails and that BuzzFeed published the emails at issue.
The dispute between Unsworth and Musk that led to the defamation suit broke out in the wake of the rescue of a Thai youth soccer team from a flooded cave last year in which both participated. Unsworth, in a July 2018 interview with CNN, called a submersible tube Musk designed for the rescue effort a "PR stunt" and said Musk "can stick his submarine where it hurts."
Musk responded in a now-deleted Twitter message that he and his team never saw "this British expat guy who lives in Thailand (sus)" while working at the caves. "Sorry pedo guy, you really did ask for it," Musk added. Musk deleted the "pedo guy" tweet and apologized on Twitter on July 18. But according to Unsworth's lawsuit, filed in the Central District of California by high-profile defamation lawyer L. Lin Wood, Musk continued to press his allegations that Unsworth was a pedophile in his email exchange with Mac, resulting in further coverage.
"As a percipient witness to some of the communications at issue in the underlying action, Mr. Mac's testimony is relevant to Mr. Unsworth's claim," Corley wrote in Monday's order. "While these facts appear to be undisputed by Mr. Musk, Mr. Mac is beyond the subpoena power of the Central District of California and thus Mr. Unsworth cannot compel him to testify at trial; Mr. Unsworth is entitled to preserve Mr. Mac's testimony in the event Mr. Musk takes a different position at trial."
Corley issued a protective order limiting the deposition to the topics Unsworth's lawyers have laid out, finding that Musk's lawyers had asked to depose Mac or some other corporate representative of Buzzfeed about "irrelevant and harassing topics" including the news organization's coverage of Musk, Tesla and SpaceX, its method for determining pay based on article popularity, and its guidelines for reporter's use of social media. Corley concluded the protective order was especially needed in this case where "the record suggests Mr. Musk feels animus toward non-party Mr. Mac."
In an email statement passed along by spokesman, Musk's lead lawyer, Alex Spiro of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan said: "Mr. Mac has been ordered to sit for a deposition — end of story."
Wood, Unsworth's lawyer, said in an email that "Judge Corley got it exactly right."
Davis Wright Tremaine's Katherine Bolger, who represents Mac and Buzzfeed, didn't immediately respond to a message Tuesday morning. Mac, who changed his Twitter handle to "Non-Party Mr. Mac," noted the order in a post Monday night:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
Meta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250