Women Leaders in Tech Law: Judith Hasko, Latham & Watkins
Hasko represented Japan's Daiichi Sankyo Co. in a global agreement to co-develop and commercialize a new antibody-drug product to treat cancer.
October 29, 2019 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
Judith Hasko, the vice chair of the health care and life sciences practice at Latham & Watkins, represented Japan's Daiichi Sankyo Co. in a $6.9 billion global agreement with AstraZeneca to co-develop and commercialize a new antibody-drug product for cancer treatment. Hasko, who is being recognized as one of 21 Women Leaders in Tech Law as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, recently reflected on her accomplishments of the past year.
What's your proudest professional achievement of the past year and why?
I am proud to have advised clients on several special, complex transactions to enable treatments for critical human diseases, such as Daiichi's collaboration with AstraZeneca to develop an antibody-drug conjugate for use in many types of cancer, Agenus' collaboration with Gilead to progress up to five potential treatments for cancer, and Tizona's strategic alliance with AbbVie to develop antibodies targeting a particular cancer-related molecule. My clients put their talents, energy and funding into creating opportunities for novel therapies, and I am able to assist them in obtaining additional significant funding and complementary capabilities and expertise through collaborations.
What's your proudest personal achievement of the past year and why?
In addition to the personal gratification I get from completing a deal for an innovative client, I also had a major family achievement recently: Organizing a destination birthday celebration for my husband with 12 other family members traveling from four states, without losing anyone or their luggage en route. It was a huge effort but led to a wonderful experience creating lifelong memories for all attending.
What's one piece of advice you'd give to a woman starting out in tech law?
Find an area of technology law that motivates you, and then learn as much as you can from more experienced attorneys about how to become a trusted legal counsel, and from your clients about their business and goals. Tech law is challenging because it requires understanding the relevant technology and the clients' operating environment while developing the ability to provide solid legal counsel in an ever-changing technical and legal world. But importantly, it is a fun and rewarding area of law so try it out!
What concrete steps could be made to increase the number of women in tech law?
There are many steps that could make a difference. Reaching out to law schools to identify women law students inclined toward technology-related interests, and enabling them to understand the practice and encouraging them to pursue tech law. Senior attorneys can provide opportunities for more junior women attorneys to explore directly the practice and demonstrate their abilities through engagement on a range of transactions with various types of clients. Companies and firms can provide support for diversity and inclusion programs, and career guidance and mentoring programs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
6 minute readJudge Approves 23andMe's $30M Data Breach Settlement - With Conditions
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250