Tech Litigation Department of the Year Finalist: Fenwick & West
"Our clients reshape industries and introduce new business models, and a litigation challenge that threatens to halt that progress can be existential," says Jedediah Wakefield, chair of Fenwick's litigation group.
October 30, 2019 at 08:30 AM
4 minute read
Fenwick & West's J. David Hadden and Saina Shamilov in Silicon Valley represented more than 60 customers of Amazon Web Services in an effort to shut down a patent enforcement campaign by nonpracticing entity PersonalWeb Technologies. Susan Muck, the firm's securities enforcement practice co-chair, and Kevin Muck, the securities litigation practice chair, defended Uber's board in shareholder derivative litigation stemming from the company's acquisition of autonomous vehicle startup Ottomotto. Partners Dean Kristy and Jennifer Bretan in San Francisco beat back a securities fraud suit targeting Tesla with claims the company misled investors about the production of its new Model 3. San Francisco partner Bryan Kohm teamed with partners in Seattle and New York to win summary judgment for supercomputer maker Cray on two patents asserted by Raytheon Co.
That resume landed Fenwick as one of six finalists for the Tech Litigation Department of the Year as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The winner will be announced at a ceremony celebrating all winners and finalists Nov. 6. The Recorder recently caught up with Jedediah Wakefield, chair of Fenwick's litigation group, about the firm's focus on litigating for technology companies.
What are the distinguishing characteristics of litigators that practice at Fenwick?
Jedediah Wakefield: Our litigators stand out in at least three key areas:
First, we are uniquely focused on the needs of technology and life sciences companies, and that focus shapes our approach to litigating and winning cases. Many of our trial lawyers have backgrounds in computer science, electrical engineering, biology and chemistry. But our case-winning strategies reflect not only our deep background in our clients' technologies, but also our understanding of what really matters for their businesses. These insights enable us to develop strategies to position our clients to win not only in the courtroom but also in the marketplace.
Second, our approach is scalable. We handle cases for companies ranging from early-stage startups to Fortune 50 companies. As a result, we have no standard playbook or one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, our approach is nimble, and we can adapt as quickly as the fast-moving clients we represent.
Third, we're trial lawyers first and foremost. Most cases settle, but we approach each case as if it will go to trial. This focus on the end-game helps us limit discovery and motions to get what we need to win. And our successful track record of not just litigating, but winning, high-stakes cases gives us credibility in negotiating successful settlements.
When a client comes to your firm for representation on a piece of litigation, what can they expect?
Clients who come to Fenwick for litigation can expect a dedicated, responsive and collegial team that is passionate about achieving our clients' business objectives. Our collaborative culture not only helps us attract and retain top talent, but also gives our litigation clients the benefit of insights and expertise from attorneys across the firm in diverse legal and industry practice areas. Fenwick litigation clients benefit from thought leaders in practice groups including patent, copyright, trademark, privacy, securities, corporate governance, and tax, and industry-specific experience in areas such as AI, gaming, digital health and fintech.
How does your firm gauge success on any particular litigation matter?
Although we take pride in our courtroom successes—and we've had an outstanding string of hard-fought victories this year—our overarching goal is to help our clients win in the marketplace. This means that, instead of focusing on any one dispute in isolation, we partner with our clients to develop a strategic approach to best position them for business success.
What ways is the business of litigation changing, and how are you adapting to those changes?
Fenwick's technology and life-sciences clients increasingly face high-stakes litigation where winning is critical. Our clients reshape industries and introduce new business models, and a litigation challenge that threatens to halt that progress can be existential. As a result, we've made investments to increase our bench strength in key strategic areas. At the same time, we've developed a dedicated pricing and product development team to help provide our clients with transparent and predictable budgets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readPatreon Hit With Lawsuit for Allegedly Diverting Subscriber Data to Meta
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
- 2Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 3What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 4Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 5Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250