Major Lindsey, Suing Ex-Partner Over Noncompete, Faces Her Claims of Misconduct
Legal recruiter Major, Lindsey & Africa is suing former partner Lauren Drake for an alleged noncompete violation after she joined California-based rival MLegal in October. Major Lindsey's lawyers refute the contention, raised by Drake's lawyer, that the firm tolerated office misconduct.
November 01, 2019 at 10:27 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The legal recruiter Major, Lindsey & Africa is suing a former partner who last month joined a competitor's new outpost in Washington, a move her lawyer said was partly spurred by her desire to escape what she claimed was a "hostile, male dominated work environment" that was tolerated without consequences.
Major Lindsey's lawsuit was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Lauren Drake, who jumped to rival recruiter MLegal Group. The complaint, brought by the management-side firm Littler Mendelson, alleged Drake has violated a noncompete provision in her employment contract with Major, Lindsey & Africa, or MLA. The suit was accompanied by a request for an injunction.
"MLA spent significant time and resources training Drake to become a first-class recruiter who built significant goodwill in the market in the District of Columbia and who had access to MLA's confidential information, including non-public candidate and law firm information as well as training materials and techniques," Littler shareholder Paul Kennedy said in court filings. "By virtue of her position with MLA, Drake had responsibilities for certain of MLA's important law firm clients as well as attorney candidates."
The litigation appears poised to open a window into workplace culture at Major Lindsey, the country's largest legal recruitment firm, and it will offer a glimpse more broadly at competition among recruiters, who help place associates, partners and in-house counsel at law firms and corporate legal departments.
Lawyers for Major Lindsey deny the firm perpetuated or otherwise tolerated any office misconduct.
"The first time MLA heard of any complaint is when we asked Lauren to honor her non-compete agreement. We have a zero tolerance policy and would have investigated any report," Maureen R. Dry-Wasson, Major Lindsey's general counsel and global privacy officer, said in a statement Friday. "As a matter of fairness to all the people who work here, I'm disappointed by the use of this tactic in a matter that is very straightforward."
California-based MLegal, which pressed into the Washington market this year, has lured away several Major Lindsey employees—including Jane Sullivan Roberts, whose husband is Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.—for the new Washington office.
Drake's lawyer, Leslie Silverman, a shareholder in Washington at the labor and employment firm Fortney & Scott, traded a series of letters in early October with Littler Mendelson in which she claimed Major Lindsey accepted a work environment plagued by sexual misconduct by high-ranking male executives.
"Despite outward appearances, the venerable legal recruitment firm has largely become a far less professional boys' club, leaving a number of its employees and, in particular, many of its stalwart older female employees feeling dismayed, disenfranchised and increasingly uncomfortable in their work environment," Silverman wrote in one letter, which was included as an attachment to Major Lindsey's lawsuit.
Silverman alleged Major Lindsey "continues to host an unprofessional and male dominated workplace atmosphere in which senior male executives engage in highly inappropriate conduct with subordinate female employees." Silverman's letters did not identify any executives by name, and no specific instance of alleged misconduct was mentioned. She said the workplace atmosphere made "Ms. Drake, and other female employees at MLA, feel powerless and uncomfortable in the workplace." Drake, according to Silverman, "expressed her discomfort directly to a key leader."
Littler's Kennedy, responding to Silverman, flatly rejected claims that Major Lindsey allowed any workplace environment where male misbehavior was allowed to flourish.
"Ms. Drake never complained about any of the issues you raise during her employment. Indeed, despite having every opportunity to complain (including under MLA policies outlining multiple avenues of recourse for alleged discriminatory behavior), she did not, and, moreover, had nothing but positive comments about MLA upon her departure, a time when one might expect candor about an employee's workplace experience," Kennedy wrote in one exchange. "We find it curious that she now raises these issues only in response to a letter demanding her compliance with MLA's non-compete obligation."
Major Lindsey "offers a diverse work environment, with multiple females in key leadership positions," Kennedy said in a letter to Silverman.
"You may be aware that MLA has a vigorous policy against harassment in the workplace, and diligently investigates—and when appropriate, remedies—any conduct deemed inconsistent with its policy," Kennedy wrote. "MLA embraces the #MeToo Movement, and is prepared to investigate further the multiple generic allegations you raise."
A Major Lindsey partner since July, Drake had worked at the firm for five years upon her resignation Sept. 24. Drake, a lawyer, formerly spent more than 16 years with the management consulting firm McKinsey & Co. before arriving at Major Lindsey. Her employment contract at Major Lindsey included a one-year noncompete clause, according to court records.
MLegal has hired two other Major Lindsey employees, including Jane Sullivan Roberts, now serving as managing partner of MLegal's Washington office. She had been a recruiter at Major Lindsey since 2007. Major Lindsey's lawsuit said Drake was the only employee among the three who was subject to a noncompete provision.
MLegal "stands to capitalize, without the same investment of resources that MLA had to make, on the goodwill and relationships that inevitably will follow Drake at MLA's expense," Littler's Kennedy said in a court filing. He said MLegal is "looking to staff its D.C. office with trained recruiters, including Drake, for purposes of gaining a fast-track competitive advantage in the market without having to undertake the investment of time and resources otherwise required."
Silverman called Major Lindsey's noncompete provision "unreasonable, unnecessary and against the public interest." MLegal, founded in 2001, "has been in the partner recruiting business for many, many years," she said in a letter. "They have developed their own databases and processes. Their recruiters have no need nor desire to use MLA's 'confidential' information."
"Ms. Drake wants nothing more than to move on with her life while being able to remain employed in a profession she loves and provide for her family," Silverman wrote in a letter to Major Lindsey's attorneys.
She also said enforcement of the noncompete provision would clash with public policy. "Today more than ever before, the public is demanding greater accountability from employers in protecting their female employees from sexual harassment, unjust treatment and hostile or abusive workplaces," Silverman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Sky Is Not Falling': Layoff Barrage Belies Continued Strength of In-House Hiring Market
'Red Herring': 11th Circuit Ravages Trump's Claims He Declassified Secret Docs
Recruiters Hunt for Red Flags Suggesting In-House Hiring Boom Will Ebb
Recruiter Joe Macrae Dishes on Hiring By Zoom and What the Pandemic Has Meant for Lateral Partner Moves
Trending Stories
- 1O'Melveny, Bracewell Add Lawyers to Texas Energy Teams
- 2Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
- 3White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
- 43 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 5Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250