Most Innovative Public Company Legal Department of the Year: NetApp
"We are constantly evolving how we work and looking for ways to work more efficiently, invest our resources wisely (whether through fixed-fee arrangements, redesigning processes or leveraging impactful technology), and to lead the way on important topics like diversity and wellness," says GC Matt Fawcett.
November 05, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
The in-house legal department at cloud services and storage company NetApp harnessed Robotic Process Automation to reduce contract processing time from 15 minutes to 2.5 minutes, freeing up half a full-time equivalent position to do more complex work. NetApp's legal team also saved more than $4 million through the use of workflow automation technology. GC Matt Fawcett also became a leading in-house voice in the ongoing discussion about mental health issues in the legal profession.
That combination of factors landed NetApp the honor of being named Most Innovative Public Company Legal Department of the Year as part of The Recorder's California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards. The Recorder recently caught up with Fawcett to discuss the in-house legal team's increasing use of technology.
The Recorder: What are the distinguishing characteristics of your in-house legal department at NetApp and the lawyers and staff that make it up?
Matt Fawcett: The NetApp Legal Department is composed of serial innovators and beta testers of new technology. We have gone from using three technologies in 2011 to using 23 technologies in 2019, half of them being added in the last three years.
We are constantly evolving how we work and looking for ways to work more efficiently, invest our resources wisely (whether through fixed-fee arrangements, redesigning processes or leveraging impactful technology), and to lead the way on important topics like diversity and wellness.
Over the past year, we were the first department at NetApp (after IT) to use Robotic Process Automation (RPA). We leveraged it in the contracting sphere to reduce agreement processing time from 15 minutes to 2.5 minutes, freeing up staff for more complex work. Additionally, we saved over $4M USD in 2018 via TAP workflow automation technology, with over 50 use cases, enterprisewide.
Finally, although we are a geographically disparate team, we make it a priority to build and maintain connectivity and community. We host a variety of meetings in Europe, Asia and the U.S., and frequently bring remote colleagues to our Sunnyvale HQ.
What was the biggest challenge your in-house team faced in the past year and how did you overcome it?
Our industry (enterprise IT) is transforming quickly, at a time where geopolitical instability is increasingly the norm and the regulatory landscape is unpredictable. Our challenge is to help the company navigate this landscape by anticipating changes, creating new tools and solutions to accelerate business and evolve risk mitigation strategies against this backdrop. Some of the ways we are addressing these challenges include the establishment of a government relations function, the formation of a Global Legal Shared Services organization to focus on delivering friction-free tools for commercial work and the creation of a Privacy Evangelist to educate customers, partners and our teams on this pressing issue.
Besides that challenge, what was your legal department's most significant accomplishment of the past year and why?
The continued use of legal technology. The members of the NetApp Legal department are comfortable with (and expectant of) the use of technology; with the continued advancement of technology, the Legal department is able to leverage these opportunities to provide value, enable the business and deliver superior service.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 2Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 3SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 5Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250