California AG Joins the Fray Probing Facebook's Privacy Practices
A court petition for documents related to Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal marks Becerra's office's first public foray into the swirl of litigation against the company.
November 06, 2019 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is seeking a court order to force Facebook to hand over documents as part of an investigation into whether the company violated state privacy laws by sharing user data with third parties.
Lawyers from Becerra's office on Wednesday filed a petition in San Francisco Superior Court seeking to get the company to respond to requests for documents about the company's policies and actions regarding third-party access to user data that date back to June 2018.
Becerra said that he has fielded many questions about California's response to Facebook's alleged privacy infractions in recent months.
"My response, to your chagrin, is always the same: We make our work public when there is a legal action to make public," he said in a press conference Monday morning. "If Facebook had complied with our legitimate legal requests, we would not be making an announcement."
The attorney general called Facebook's response to its inquiries "patently inadequate." Wednesday's petition claims the social media giant has remained silent on the agency's June 2019 request for answers to 19 interrogatories, six documents requests and communications from senior executives including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg.
When asked why California decided to go it alone in its investigation into Facebook's procedures around user privacy, disclosures and third-party access to user data, Bercerra said, "How do you know we are not teaming up with others?"
Right now, Becerra said, keeping California's tech companies honest when it comes to privacy is "tough," forcing the Department of Justice to adapt consumer protection and general privacy laws. However, when the California Consumer Privacy Act takes effect Jan. 1, it will be a "watershed moment," the attorney general said.
To make the law as effective as possible, California is hosting hearings for public comment in Sacramento, San Francisco, Fresno and Los Angeles between Dec. 2-5.
Becerra called the law one of the only ways "to hold tech companies accountable."
"We want to make sure we're getting these rules right," he said. "This is a conversation about your data and your privacy."
Exhibits attached to Wednesday's petition indicate that lawyers at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, including partner Benjamin Powell and senior associate Maury Riggan in Washington, D.C., have been representing Facebook in the state's investigation.
Facebook representatives didn't immediately respond to request for comment Wednesday.
The attorney general's office first began its inquiry with subpoenas in June 2018. Facebook waited a full year to reply.
The attorney general's action adds to the company's complicated legal fallout from the Cambridge Analytica scandal. At a hearing earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California suggested possibly forcing Facebook to hand over documents provided to U.S. regulators to lawyers pursuing privacy claims against the company in multidistrict litigation he's overseeing.
"We will act when we must," Becerra said. "Today we make this information public, because we have no choice."
Read more:
California Makes Noise About Antitrust Probe Into Auto Emissions Deal, Stays Mum on Tech
Facebook's Regulatory Discovery Could Be Fair Game in Proposed Privacy Class Action
Judge Advances Cambridge Analytica Case, Says Facebook's Privacy Argument 'Could Not Be More Wrong'
Facebook Asks Federal Judge to Block State Court Document Hunt in Shareholder Derivative Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Hires Anthony Shannon as Chief People Officer
- 2Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 3Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 4Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 5Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250